# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068578:0014
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068578:0014?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Philosophie LH 4, 3, 4
# Folio 7v, page id 00068578:0014
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 8r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068578&page=14
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068578/jpgs/default/00000014.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 15 lines, status machine
# Lines: 15 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

La riberté de proposer quelques doutes
qui me restent sur ses doctes éclaireo
demens.
Je conviens qu’il ay à dans les
ccrpi une force d’agir et de resister a
laction mais il ne semple que la notion
de l’efendace est anterieure à celle de cere
Ferce puisque l’action et la resistance supp
dan les corpr partes eatra parte, et
se incicem agentes.
es
2. Je veur lien que le monvement ne
soit qu’un resvetat de la ferce d’agir des corp
May cela ne me donne pas eneore une idée
paritive de cette perce. or c’est de quoy is sagit.