# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068617:0010
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068617:0010?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Philosophie LH 4, 5, 4
# Folio 5v, page id 00068617:0010
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 6r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068617&page=10
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068617/jpgs/default/00000010.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine
# Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

quodeunque eum B comnatibile velut C. F. etc.
Jam ex AB X a non licet inferre a YB ∞ a. licet
enim B contineatur in a. non ideo Y53 continebitur in
a.
Simdliter pro AS ∞ Ad3 Eno non onfertur
aYB ∞ AYB Eno. Etsi enim VB sit Euo ex hypothesi
non ideo sequitur aY eose Ens.
Htaque hina pcatet
praedicatum propositionis affirmativae non esse universale
Ostendamur jam simili modo methodo praedicatum propositio
nis negativar esse universale. Rempe, si AB non ∞ l
etiam aYB non ∞ a. Sive enim Yid sit ∞ 3, aut
aY ∞ B sive non, res procedit, nam si YB ∞ B, vel
aY ∞ a subititui poterunt pro B vel pro a. Si vero
non aequipoleant, mutto magis a Y B a non aequi-
pollebunt. Idem est in AB non ∞ aB Ens.
Sunerest ut demonstremus subjectum habere quanti-
tatem suac propositionis. In U. a. A3 ∞ et. Ergo
e YaB ∞ Va
Sed in P. n. si AB non ∞ A
non hini sequitur YaB non ∞ YA, nam Si Y ∞ B,
foret YaB ∞ Ya. Bursas vero in V. n. Si ad non
est Eno etiam YAB non est. Eno. seu si AB non ∞ aB Enu
etiam VaB non ∞ YaB Ens.
Sed in S a. Si AB
est Ens non sequitur etiam YaB esse Ens; poteit enim
sub Y aosumi aliquid incompatibile eum a e S.
Haque ex nostro calculo omnes collegimus regulas distri-
butionum.
Caeterum d in altero illo modo demonstrandi logdeas
formas, ubi non per Ideas sed ner exempla subjecta
progredimur, refellerend refellenda erit, prava illa consequentias
omnis ridens est homo, Ergo quidam homo est ridens seu
ridet.
Senous est omnis ridens possibilio, est homo
ergo quidam home est ridens possibiles reité. Hunc
senoun ostendit nostra interpretatio, quee conversionem pes
accidens legitimam reddit.
Jano ridens ∞ riders Ens.
Sridens  ridens homo.
Ergo ridens hono
 ridens homo Ens, quia ridens X ridens Ens.