# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068646:0103 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068646:0103?run=74 # Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Philosophie LH 4, 7B, 2 # Folio 52r, page id 00068646:0103 # Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 51v); this page is its right half. # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068646&page=103 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068646/jpgs/default/00000103.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine # Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.95 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. ut ostendet resolutio nam sit A+ B-B - P F, d et A∞ Z + M, et B∞ N+ M, et p ∞ H + M frat 4+ dico fore A. +∞F. Num resolvendus fiet A F ∞ A P hocc hocest ∞ g M resolvendo dico fore A F ∞ A- D. Nam A resolvendo A, B, Y fiet Y ∞ Q+ M 4+ N+M - N - M - H - M ∞ AA (per ax. 2.) Q- H. quod ∞ A- P, seu e+ M- H - M verum quando ignoratur si A est in L es A B est in L quaeritur an sit hoc mam restum est recessaria etiam B sit in L A + B ∞ A+ C A+ positione quam detractione restetatur in hoc calculo aterae A, B, etc. significant certa quaedam irreptribilia varbi gratia res singulare item notiones universales ne, unde repetitio est inutilis; item ordinus quoque hic non habefioratio suballematur calculo de combinationibus in universum ubi non tameditur si A est in L erit A+B in L+B Axioma A+ A ∞A Nam A + N ∞ L Ergo A+ B ∞ Ergo +B∞ A+ N+B Nam L∞ A+ N. jam A+ B est in A+ N + B. Ergo in L+B si A + B est in L+B, A est in N L hoc non aquitur si A est in B si A est in B et B est in A erit A∞B se A est in B Nam si A non ∞ B et tamen A in Nam si A est in B erit A+ N ∞ B. Ergo A+ N est in A. Ergo N est in A Ergo AtH∞ probunda haec consequentia: Si A + N est in A, etiam N est in Nam si A+ N est in A. Erit A + A + N ∞ A Eergo (per prop.) Ergo A+ N∞A (per ax.) Ergo (per prop. N est in A si A+ N est in A etiaq N est in A u Nest in A+p