# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068656:0675
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068656:0675?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Jurisprudenz LH 2, 1
# Folio 6r, page id 00068656:0675
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 7v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068656&page=675
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068656/jpgs/default/00000675.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 40 lines, status machine
# Lines: 40 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

insutissime et (carissime
dn
autor Honoratissime
Anxiβerar, quam in tractanda juris Arte a se desiderari
video, adeo non improbo, ut potius a me olim cum methodum
illam qualemcrnqu darem reneri semper poruisse optaverim. Magni
enim refert ad ipsam scientiam constituendam certas accuratasque
habere comprehensiones.
Gratissimus est eorum indiculus
quae in libetto illo neo, cur caeteroqui niniem tribuis difficultatem
habere videntur. Ii nonnullis satisfecissem credo facilius
olim nunc enim meditatione longi opus foret ad cogitationes
veteres resuscitandas, Vican tamen quae in menten venient
consideranti, ut si minus eapectationem tuam impleo, sittem
volentatem neam probem.
part. spec.)
nomoo 5.) In Methodo paragraphus 15. et parag2. 19. Ita pret a
adsurjectum conciliabuntur. Successionen nempe paragraphus 13. retalit
ad subjcctum Lualitatis moralis (scujuris et obligationis)
poia
potius quam ad ejus causam, quia successione judicatam
non produci jus novum sed vetus traesferri. Snterim
etsi non pertineret successio ad modos producendi juri
pertinet tanen ad modos uquirendi, atque ideo subis enum erati
est 8. 19. Caeterum rem nagis ad vivun resecando dici posse
saccessionem, esse, quandam desuncti repraesentationem, potius
acquisctionem, i. c. vel pductionem vel.
quam juris, translationem. Ssam alioqui negari non potest
idem numero jus de persona un personam transire uon posse
i.e numero diversum, utut specie c objecto ide
sed novum, nasci debere, stagu si successorem ex propria persona
consideremus dicendum foret novum jus in eo natum Ne.
ECurine 2.) Objectum juris et Obligarionis seu, ut ita dican, Con- subtu
sum sitju ad geltum sive correlatum in 5. 16. per summa tantum capita
alitatis mor.
et simul ad
modos acquendi.
munerioesse
cierujgris is-
rem.