# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068657:0001
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068657:0001?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Philosophie LH 4, 4, 2
# Folio 1r, page id 00068657:0001
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 2v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068657&page=1
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068657/jpgs/default/00000001.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 21 lines, status machine
# Lines: 21 recognised, mean confidence 0.98
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

Lcconitu responsio, qua de fato disserit.
Fatum est decretum dei, seu necessitas eventuum: fa-
talia, quae necessario eventura. Bivium difficile
Deus aut non de omnibus decernit; aut, si de omni-
bus decernit, esse absolute omnium aucorem. Nam
si de omnibus decernit, et ter dissentiunt a decreto,
non erit omnipotens. Si vero non de omnibus derer
nit, videtur sequi, non esse omniscium. Impessibile
enim videtur, omniscium indicium suum de aliqua
re suspendere. Duod nos sape iudicia suspendimus, fit
ex ignorantia. Hinc sequitur, deum num quan se posse
habere pure permissive: sequetur etiam, nullum de-
cretum dei esse reuera non absolutum. Nos enim
suspendimus iudicia nostra conditionibus et alternatio-
nibus, quia minime exploratas rerum circumstantias
habemur. Sed dura hac. Fateor. Quid ergo? Erie.
Gilatus damnatur. Cur? Quia caret fide. Sur caret?
Juia caruit voluntate allentionis. ur hac? luia non
intellexit rei necessitatem, attendendi utilitatem. Non
intellexit, quia causae intellectionis defuere. Omnia
enim necesse est tesolui in rationem aliquam, nec sub