# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068659:0120
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068659:0120?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Jurisprudenz LH 2, 6
# Folio 60v, page id 00068659:0120
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068659&page=120
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068659/jpgs/default/00000120.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 35 lines, status machine
# Lines: 35 recognised, mean confidence 0.95
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

PROBLEMA TUIRTDTCUM
ritate rerum, non tamen vule illam convictionem consiteri,
sed contra conscientiam Falla docer. Prior illa, ut ex iis, ouxe
modo ex Theolosis nostratibus adduxi, patec, huc non perti-
nec, atque adeo pertinacia est improprie dicta. Posterior
raro dabilis es, cum naturx humanae fere imporibile sic, nisi
Forte metu doloris, aliter loqui de rebes ad intellectum perri-
mentibus, ac lentias. Mud jam notorium, inter mille haereci-
c0s, etiam Doctores, maximam partem bonâfide errare. Vri
vero calumnia, quando Pontificii de nostris TLcologis
dicune, eosdocere concra conscientiam; ita desectui converla-
tionis aut pereorinationum adscribendum est, si nostrinos per-
(vadere volune, ac forte sibi iplis perlradent, Pontificios, item
Reformatos Theolosos aut alterius sectae Doctores regulariter
esse pertinaces. et in conscientia de Falsitate doctrinxe sux con-
victos. Or taceam, quod et modus legitimus convincendi
haereticos, quem pertinacia praesupponit, plerumque, si non
plane exulet, Calrem ralde inCertuS CC. Convincere non cAt,
actibus metum incutientibus aut autoritate judiciali alte-
rum actigere, ut aliquid verum esse Fateatur. sed amice, ratio-
num ponderibus aut efficaciâ ac virture spirituali, per discur-
lum aut interrosationes planas alteri errorem commonstrare.
Ita Chrictus ex Apostoli convincebant advertarios. Sed Anti
chrictus Paerit in dissentientes, carceribus, morte, relexationi-
Dus, autoritate judiciali, plaralitate vocorum, contiscatione,
librorum. Et hoc convincere errantes appellat. Relexantur
haeretici, aut, ne introeant auditorium, aut, sintroeant, ne
opponant ex conterant, caretur. Tum disputatur contra ab.
sentes ant loqui non audentes. Ec hoc convincere dicitur
Otinam vero Papistica hac convictio non regnaret, etiam inter
Franselicos. Pacerem lubenter, nili lapides clamarent, et non
loquereturpranis publica ex communis.
e. onpucallocas coc clouo Cubjacece delmitionem tae
releos. Jam tamen eorum finis erit. C. Imo et de errore
acthuc