# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068778:0047
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068778:0047?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zu Deutschland LH 12, 3, 4
# Folio 24r, page id 00068778:0047
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 25v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068778&page=47
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068778/jpgs/default/00000047.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 27 lines, status machine
# Lines: 27 recognised, mean confidence 0.98
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

Vitur tertio Cardinalis similitudine.
Nam, inquit, cum Papa, velut Frinceps secularis Romae
aut alius Pripceps
alibi judais permittit exercere usuram, non ideo usuram
licitam reddit, ino nec validos declarat contractus usura.
rios, etsi brachium seculare deneget Christiano, qui usu-
ram tudao solutam condictione indebiti repetere vellet.
Et nihilominus Judaeus semper tenebitur pecuniam
velut indebite solutam restituere, quia usura est
contra jus naturale et diuinum; net si quando eue
niet, ut ludaeus convertatur, et fiat Christianus;
tenebitur in conscientia pecuniae usurariae velut ille-
cite acceptae facere restitutionem. Zolem modo, in-
quit Cardinalis dicendum est, matrimonia Protestan-
tium in gradu prohibito invalida esse; imperatorem
autem denegando brachium seculare contra ipsa eaque
tolerare; nec ideo minus Protestanti connerso integrum
esse ab eo matrimonio recedere. Sed ut ad has tres
distinctionis allatae rationes ab ultima respondere
incipiam, videtur haec similitudo retorqueri posse con-
tra ipsum Cardinalem. Nam nego ipsi, contractus
ludaeorum vsurarios, a Principibus Christianis tolera-
tos, esse insalidos; et ad probationem, quod Tudaei
conpersi restitutionem facere teneantur in consci-
entia seu foro poli, respondeo, hinc sequitantum,.
contractus eorum osurarios manere semper illicitos;
non