# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068778:0052
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068778:0052?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zu Deutschland LH 12, 3, 4
# Folio 26v, page id 00068778:0052
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 27r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068778&page=52
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068778/jpgs/default/00000052.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 28 lines, status machine
# Lines: 28 recognised, mean confidence 0.97
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

aliquod inter Christianos habitum fuisse validum jure
ciuili, et inualidum jure canonico. Sane constat exjure
Contificio, si parentes matrimonium irritum contrahen-
tes ignorent impedimentum, infantes legitimos haberi
sed non ideo matrimonium erit validum jure cicili, ne-
que ex eo soluto conjugibus competent lucra matri-
monialia, satis que erit eos indemnes sernati, etsi
nihil ex matrimonio putatitio lucrentus, ut recte in
suprema Brabantiae curia decisum refert Petrus
Stocamans, Ietus doctissimus, et nuper catholici
Regis ad Imperii Comitia circuli Burgundici nomi-
ne legatus qui et Wamesii in eam rem Responsum ad
ducit Consil. Canori. Fom. Z. Consil. 542. Casus autem
apud Stockmannum in Decisionum Brabanticarum
sesquicenturia decis. 62. his verbis relatus est: Conju-
gium inierant duo, quos spiritualis cognatio secun-
dum leges Canonicas nuptias contrahere vetabat, in
 eoque conjugio 12. annis manserant et aetatem exe
gerant: leciusculum erat impedimentum, et quol sere
in ignorari solet ab hominibus proletariis et plebejis.
i Nimirum ante nuptias mulieo filiolo primage-
nito mariti sui in saceamento confirmationis vit
in testis et parens mystica astiterat. ) post multas veli-
ex solius
tationes conclusum est, tale coniugium, etsigaris
 canonici regulis mualido, tamen etiam jureci-
 uili non valere, nec ex coniugio ejusmodi putatitio
luerum