# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068778:0079
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068778:0079?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zu Deutschland LH 12, 3, 4
# Folio 40r, page id 00068778:0079
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 41v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068778&page=79
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068778/jpgs/default/00000079.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 26 lines, status machine
# Lines: 26 recognised, mean confidence 0.98
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

Contrariae sententiae autores solis nituntur Rescri-
ptis Pontificum. Sed praeterquam quod nondum evi-
ctum, rescripta Poritificum (habere vim legis oni-
versalis in Ecclesia, tamet si praeiudicum insignis ac-
toritatem habere non negetui; sciendum est prae-
terea, ne quidem ex Rescriptis Pontificum satis
probari thesin aduersamCitantur quidem in eam
rem ab aduessarus: C. tuam de ori. Cogn. el C. mul-
torum 45. 9. 6. et C. a redeuntibus de excessibus
praelatorum sed hi textus tantum probant, quod
judicium de caussis matrimonialibus sit fori Eccle
siastici; quod quomoilo intelligi debeat, jam dixi.
Propius ad scopum ferit C. 1. de sponsalibus, abi
quidam Fruncigena foeminam haxonem duxerat,
et caussatus, non esse suam, quod aduersus Franco-
rum legem minerit matrimonium, et proinde
fuerit nullum, transit ad alias nuptias. Oecidit
textus, prius matrimonium, non obstante ea lege
fuisse validum. Resporsio est facilis, potuisse id ma-
trimonium esse contra Francorum legem non qui-
dem irritantem, sed tantum prohibentem; nam leges
in matrimonialibus praesumuntus sempec prohiben-
tes potius quam iritantes. Quod exemplo deda-
rabo. Si Hespanus aliquis incitis parentibus
matrimonium contraheret, et peteret postea id deca-
rari