# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068778:0102
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068778:0102?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zu Deutschland LH 12, 3, 4
# Folio 51v, page id 00068778:0102
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 50r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068778&page=102
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068778/jpgs/default/00000102.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 27 lines, status machine
# Lines: 27 recognised, mean confidence 0.98
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

in illis incidenter tractantur quastiones de validitate
matrimoniorum, sed etiam officiales Ecclesiastici ita pro-
nuntiant. Nam cum anno 160b. Henricus V. instantisi
mis dleri precibus concessisset, ut de validitatibus matri
moniorum non nisi ipsi directe judicarent, hanc conditi-
onem addidit, ut inter pronuntiandum leges Regni et
iam super matrimoniorum validitatibus latae, obsea
rentur. Inutile autem fuerit citare Afesta Partamenti
cum eorum non sit numerus, et, ut in re constante
et certa pleni sint illis omnes Arestorum compilationes
Louetii, touetii aliorumque. Nec vero dici potest, hanc
ordinationem non esse introductricem nossi juris, sed
id ot tantum quod diccini est juris, reduxisse. Parentibus
enim obedientiam a liberis deberi, et Fuaristum
Pontificem respondisse, conjunctiones aliter factas
non matrimonia, sed contubernia habendas, can. 1.
caus. 30. qu. 5. Verum hoc nunc quidem a nullo
Catholico dici potest. erroris enim argueret Eccle-
siam, quae illis in locis, ubi leges contra non sunt
haec matrimonia admittit. Fuaristus respondet de
jure Romano sui temporis, ubi consensus parentum
necessarius erat nuptiis, ut vel hinc appareat, Ponti-
fices veteres credidisse, quod leges, a Principibus secu-
laribus circa validitates matrimoniorum latae sint
tenendae. Et vero consensum parentum jure naturali
et diuino ad ipsam matrimonii essentiam pertinere
ne