# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00069350:0007
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00069350:0007?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Philosophie LH 4, 5, 11
# Folio 4r, page id 00069350:0007
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 3v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00069350&page=7
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00069350/jpgs/default/00000007.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 39 lines, status machine
# Lines: 39 recognised, mean confidence 0.96
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

suos
operatio
uisumpe et quo opus sinihil obstet, consequatur
actus operancliue faecunsitatem quibus acleli potist, quod alibo a me
explicatum est, etsi nondum fortasse satis perspectum omnibus,
ipsam rerum substantiam in agensi patiendius vi consistere. unse
consequens est, ne res quidem elurabiles pro duci posse, si nulla ipsis
vis aliquamdiu permanons divina virtute imprimi potost.
Ia sequoretur nullam substantiam creatam, nullam animam
eandem numero manere, nihilqus adés a Deo conservari, ac
pive fluxas
Mroince res omnes esse tantum evaniclas quastam Cumus divis
permanentis
nae substantiae (modificationes et phasmata ut sic clivam;
et quod eodem resit, ipsam naturam vel substantiam rerum
omnium, Deumeic; qualom pessimae notae Soctrinam nuper
Scriptor quidam subtilis, at profanus, orbi invexit vel reno-
continerent
vavit sane si res nom corporales nil nisi materiale haberent, verissima dicerentur
in fluxu consistere, neque habere substantiale quidquam; quemadmodum et platonici olim ecte agnovere
(9) Altera quaestio est, utrum creaturae proprie et vere
agere sint dicencae; ea si semel intelligamus, naturam insitam
Sy et patiendi,
non difserre à vi agensi aue non potat et pationdi, reoidit
in priorem. Nam actio sine vi agondi  ossonva
potest, et vicism manis potentia ost, quae nunquam potest
exerceri, quia tamen nihilominus actio et potentia res sunt
diversa, illa successiva, haec permanons, videamus et de
non exiguam in explicanda, mente,
actione; ubi fateor me maijorem in enotanca (elebe sturmii
erodanda
mente quam in explicanda re difficultatem reperire. Negat
nolit Molit quodamm
cedit eas agere, ut aegre etiam ferato sibi Tribui comparatio
nem creaturarum cum bipenni a fabro lignario mota.
Ex quibus nihil certi exsculpere possum, nec diserte satis expli-
catum video quousque ipse a feceptis sententiis recedat 
aut quamnam
tare cogar an certam et distinctam animo concoporit aciamis