# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0051
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0051?run=74
# Title: The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 163)
# Folio 39, page id 1030877386:0051
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1030877386&page=51
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1030877386/jpgs/default/00000051.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 73 lines, status machine
# Lines: 73 recognised, mean confidence 0.80
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

That noe
et Frec
DlB
IA Pone
sec tddo
he Stain
Much les
lOC Frecs
ne ol
n side rnoi
For M
Babst si
nOINOI
Ametor
hieh Ldu
BIB
de mi
reedom
 pover
ootan
Null
1
N
hallnor
rone
ed. 1B
turonat
Mbbs b
s 50nB b
100 Bor 
dnhat 1
more t
itatel, 1
rH, L
3
manbe Freeto Act, he is much more Frect. Will; becanse
Qiod efficic cale illud magis est cale; as if he sontà say, if L
mate him ancry, then Jam more angry; because. Quod ef-
cic, ∞c. Thethirdis, IFche Will De decermined, chen che
uricinsis decermined, andhconeht not 2o say hemay Wrice,
but he mult vrice. Tis erne, it follometh ebat he multvrice
bas it doth not follor Ponche 10 say hemult Wriie, untess he
nould have me say more than Pexon, as himself deth ofien in
this Reply.
Ascer his Arcuments, come his difficult Questions. It
ehe W ill oF man be decermined wiehouc his WViII, Or wichoue
any chins in tuis porver, uhy do e asti men Whechercher
Willdo lucha chins OrnOC? L’ansirer, Becanse me desire 10
enom, and cannot lnam bat by theirtelline, nor thenneither
for the most part. Wrhy do rre reprelene reasons cochem e
Why dorrepray chem: Why do ve intreaccheme lans-
ver because thereby me thinte to male them havethe Will they
havenot. Wrhy do weblame cheme Lansiver, because 1h. Y
pleasens not. Tmiehe aste him, wherber blamine be any thine
else bnc faging the ttans blamed is ill or imperfeit. May not
ve P. 1y a Floise is lame, thouch his lamenesscane from neces
sity; or that a manis a foolor a bnave, if he beso, ihouch
he conldnot helpic To Whac purpole did our Saviour (ay c0
che Paralycique persen, Wilerhou bemade clean, ittis W ill
rrere excrinlecally determined . Y ansmer, ihat it vas not
because he vouldenom, for hebnem it before; but because he
vould dram fromhim a confession of his manc. We have piped
unco vou, and vehrave noc danced; hon could chei helpic e
Lansiver, tbey conld not help ic. Irrould have sachered vour
Childrenas cheHlen gaherech her Chiekens under herrrines.
bucve rrouldnoc. Horrcasily miche cheransrrer accordin
c0T. FI. hisdoctrine, Alas, b’ame noc us, our vvills arenOC
in cur ovrn porver? Lansmer, ibcyare eobe blamed thonch
theirills benor in theiroronponer. Is not cood cood, and
evill evilt thonehthey be not in our porver? and sall not l
cauthem (0: andis not that Praise and BlameF But it
scems the Bichop takes Blame not for ibe dispraise of a thine.
but for a pratext andcolour of malise and revenze acainst him