# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0089
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0089?run=74
# Title: The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 163)
# Folio 77, page id 1030877386:0089
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1030877386&page=89
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1030877386/jpgs/default/00000089.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 62 lines, status machine
# Lines: 62 recognised, mean confidence 0.79
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

celhelu
C, pei
Mlle,
Phereie
CO com
mmende
bac, V1
hache
V aICnO
10d8 Ch
pale bnt
lECMarC
vesertro
adres
ite, did
ut alvat
pand a I
njust
15 noII
THIEIBI
juttit
GranB)
chotH
oreereil
oalHet 1
2
argument al(o. He telsus, ehac he wasnocsuopriled. WVI e
cher he wece or nOF, is more chanL know. Bucchis Llcc
plainly, chaceicher heisnocprorided, orthachis caule ad-
mies no chorce oFamvers. The seus dealeingenousy when
elies met wich a difficule knoc, Wtich ches couldnocuncie,
EO PRLICMPOn Elius. F.. 12S Will ansver it when he comes.
Animadvertions iipon che Bishops R eply
etumb. A.
 HF Bistrop argued thus. Thirdly, il chere BenO crve
liberer, buc allehinss comero pals by incricable necel.
Cicy, chen whaca:e as chosc incerrosations we find (0 fre-
quenels in holy Scripeures, (be ic spoten wich all dueret-
Pect) buc faisned and hyprcritical exasgerarions d Flere
puttins tocether trorepuenant suppositions cithererafrily or (be
it spolen mith al due respect) ienoranily. he ronld have men
beleeve that L becanse Lbold Necessity. I deny Liberty. L
hold as muchthat there is true Liberty, as hedoth, and more.
for Thold it as from Necessity; and thatthere must of Neces-
siry be Liberty, but heholds it nocfrom Necessity, and so makes
it pessible there maybenone. His expostulations vere, First,
Hast chou eacen ofehe eree whereot Icommoned cheechae
chou Mouldest noc eard Sccondly. Why hast chou done chis :
Thiraly. Wrhyare chouweoch, and hy is chy COHCenANCC
east doun d Fourchly. Why willve dyc O houle oF. IIraeld
Phese Areuments requirine the same ansiver which some o-
ther do, Lthouphe fit toremit them toiheir fellomes. But the
BimoD will not allor me that. Por he (aith,
a Cercainly saith he distinet Areumenes, as chechird and
tilchare, esc. did require distinct anserS.
Jam therefore tosive an acconnt ofthe meanins of the afore-
said objnrcarions and expostulations: Nst of rhe end for mhich
God Sard Hlast chouearen ot therree _C. but hom ibose mords
may be calen mithont repugnanceto the doctrine of N’ecessity.
These mords Has choueacen oFcherrec Whereos ( command.
ed chac chou Moudest nOeaF. Convince Adam that noE-
vith.