# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0096
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0096?run=74
# Title: The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 163)
# Folio 84, page id 1030877386:0096
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1030877386&page=96
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1030877386/jpgs/default/00000096.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 39 lines, status machine
# Lines: 39 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

(84
eleare, and Lomerimes disturbed, and oF reason cietier rigte
or mil. informed. Wichoueche help ot cheunderstandins.
allhis Eccond causesvere noc able of chemselres to lond che
tlorles back wich so much meisheas cheleast oF althis Fea-
thers doch amoune unco. Buc We Mall meet wich his Horte
loadofteachers again Numb. 23.
Thelechinss beins chus brieAy couched, he proceeds eo His
an Cver. My arsumene waschis, IFany OFchele craII chele cau
Ses Formerty reciced, do cake amay erue liberer, (chac is, RilI
incended trom necessiey) chen Adam betore his Fallhad no
crue liberei.
Buc Adam betore histall had erue liberey.
Elemis. recicesthearpumene, and denies che consequence.
whict is (o clearly proved chacno manlivine can donbrofic.
Decaule Adam W2s subjected co all the same causes as Well as
we, che lame decree, the lame prescience, the lame inAu.
ences, the same concourle ot causes, the lame efficacy of
objects, che lame dictates oFreason Buc ic is onely a mistake,
Foric appcars plairly by his Followins discourse, chac he
incended eo den, norehe conseouence, bue che alsumprion;
Forhe makes Adam co have had noliberey From necessiey
beforehistall, vea heprocecdssotar, a5to aftirm, chae
all hemane wills, his and ours, and cach propention of
our wills, even durins our deliberation, aro as mnch ne-
cesticaced as ans chins elle whatloerer; ehac wehare no
more pover co Forbearchose actions which we do, chanche
Eire hach pover noc eo burn. Thoueh Thonour T. FI. For his
person, and torhislearnins, vec Imust contels inseniousy, I
hace chis Doctrine From my heart. And Ibeliere boch I hare
reaCon (oco do, and al ochers who all seriously ponderche
horrid consequences which Now Fromit Ic destroyes liber-
ev, e distionours the nature ofMan. TEmakes ehe second cau-
ses e ourward objects co berhe Rackers, and MenEO BC BuF
the Tennis- BalIS OF destiny. Temates he first cause, chat
1s, Crod almisher, eo beche ineroducer oPall erit, and sin
into ehe worid, asmuchas Man, veamorechan Man, by 25
much as chemorionoF, che W acchi is more fromehe Artificer,
who didmake ic and mind ic up, chan cither Erom che sprins