# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0100
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0100?run=74
# Title: The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 163)
# Folio 88, page id 1030877386:0100
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1030877386&page=100
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1030877386/jpgs/default/00000100.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 40 lines, status machine
# Lines: 40 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

(88
is there injustice wich G0d: G0d forbid. It is vot cherefore
in him that willeth. non in him that runveth, but in God that
Bervethmerey. Forthe Scripture (aith eo Pharaoh, Lhave
stirred thee up, that l may Berm my porver in thee, and that
my Name maybe set forch inall ihe carth. Therefore rhom
Cod willeth, he hath mereyon, and rhom hewilleth hehard.
enctb. Thus pon see the case put bySc. Paul, is the same mith
chat ofY. D. andehe same objection in these mords follomine.
Thouvilt aste me then, hy will sod zet complain, for who
hath resistedbis mille Zo this the efore the Apostle ansvers,
not by dengins it was Guds will, er that che décrec of God con-
cerninz Flou vas noi before behad sinned, or that Flau mas
not necessitated eo do mhat he did, butthus, Who art rho, 0
Man ihat interrosatest G0d? Babl the Worte say to the
wortman, wby hast thon made methus. J. FLathnotthe Potter
porrer overthe Cilay; of the same stuff, to make one vessel 10
honour, anorher te distoneur? Accordins therefore to this
ansmer of Sc. Pauil, Tansver J. Dsobjection, and say. The
porverofCodalone, withont otherhelp, is sufficient Fustifica-
rion os an actronhe doch. That wobich men mahe amone them-
selveshere by Pacts and CCvenants, and call by the name af
Fnstice, and accordins whereunto men are counted and tearm.
edrichesy just and uniust, is not that by hich Cod Almich-
ties actionsare tobe meauredor called just, no more thanhis
connsails are to be measured by human misedom That mhioh
he does is made just by his doine; Fust L say in him. not almaies
just in us by the Fxample; for a mantbat sall command a
thine openty, andplot secret ly the hinderance of the same. it
he ponist him heso commande d for not doing it, is unjust. So
alsohis Coansails, they be therefore not in vain, because they
be his, mhether me see the use of them or not. When God
assticted T0b, he did object no sin to him, but instified that
afsictins him bytellins him of hispover. Hast thon (sayes
Cod) un arm liee mine? rbere wast thon When L laid the
foundations of the carthe andthe like. Soour Saviour con-
cernins the manthat mas born blind, said it mas not for his
sin, nor his parents sin, butthat ehe poiver of Codmizbe be
Bemninhim. Deastsare subject to deathand torment, yet they
cannet