# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0112
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0112?run=74
# Title: The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 163)
# Folio 100, page id 1030877386:0112
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1030877386&page=112
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1030877386/jpgs/default/00000112.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 40 lines, status machine
# Lines: 40 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

(100)
Secondly, ehis objection conceined ver. 29. 1o which ctie
ApoMle ansIVerS Ver. 20. is nocmade inthe perton ot. P (an
Oe Pharach, a5 T. FI. Suxpolech, bue of che unbelierins Jcus,
ho chouohe much ac chac prace and Farour which Cod was
pleased eo rouchsate unto ehe Gentiles, to acknomledge
ehiem Forhis p: Ople. Wrhich honour chey vould have appro.
priaced eo ehe polterier oE Abraham. And che ApOCles
ansiver is noc onely deaun from chesoreraion Dominion
oFCiod, coimpare his grace comtom heplealech, as hacti
been Chemed already. buc allotrom the obstinacy and pro-
per FaulcoFche TeWs, as appearech ver. 22. Trhat if God wil.
linq (chac is, by a consequent Will) tosen his rrath, and
10 matee his pover lnovn, endurethmithmuch lone sufferine
the vessels of vorath futed to destruction. They acted, 66d
endured; They vere colcraced by Crod, bue Rcced to de
Pruction by chiemselres; Fortheir muchurrons doinz, here
is Codsmuch lone sufferine; Andmore plainty rec. 31. Is.
rael hathnot acteined to the Lam of richteonsness, wherefore e
because they soncht it not by faith, but as it vereby the mortes
of the Lam. Thisreason is set downyee more emphiarically in
EhE RENE CHaPEeK Ver. 3. They (chacis, the Israelies) bcine
ienorant of Gods richreonsness (chac is, by Faieh in Christ,)
and eoins abont to establiss their omn righiconsness, (Chac iS
by cherorks oF ehe LaW) have noc submitted themselvesto
therichiconsness of 60d. And vecmost expresty ChaD. IF.
ver. 20. Because of undelief they vere broken off but thonstand
est byfaith. Neicher waschere any precedene bindine de-
crecot God, conecessitare chem eo unbeliet, and conse-
quenely copunistimene. Ic was in cheir oon pover by cheie
concurrence wich Cods grace ro prevene chese iudgemens.
and corccorertheir former ectate, ver. 23. If ibcy (ChaC I5,
che unbelidrine Jeus) abide not still in unbelies, theq sall be
erafredin. TheCroun and che sord are immorable, (co use
SC. Anselmes comparison) buc ic is ve chaemore s change
places Somecimesthe sews vere under ehe Crown, and che
Cenciles under theSword, Pomerimes che Ters under che
Sword, and cheGenciles under the Crown.
Thirdly, choush Pcontels, ehac human pactsare noe thie
mealure