# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0177
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0177?run=74
# Title: The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 163)
# Folio 177, page id 1030877386:0177
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1030877386&page=177
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1030877386/jpgs/default/00000177.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine
# Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.90
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

e
intena
(197
For he belecverhno such damnation, nor intendeth any prepara-
tion. Thebelees of damnation is an Article of Christian faith:
s0 is also preparation to rhe Sacrament. Tis therefore a vain
question, hom he ihaet hathno faith Ball prepare himself rith
care and conscience tothe receivine of the Sacrament. But 10
the questionhom theyBall prepare themselves ibat Ball at ail
prepare themselves; L’ansmer it sall be by Faith, When Crod
Bal sive it them.
Tohis FToW MaII a man make a free ron eo God, Who
chimtshimselFable eo pertormnochins, buc as heis exerin-
secally necesarared. Tansiver, thatif he male a vou it is a
Free vor, Cor elseit is no vor) and vet he may lnom hen he
hatb made that vor, (. thonch not before) that it mas extrinse-
cally nocessitated, for the necessity of vorine before he vorved,
hindered notthe Frcedome othis Vom, but made il.
Lastiy, eotlon Mall a man condemm and accuse himselE
Forhis sins, Who chinkshim (elFeo be like a Wacch whict
is wound up by 60d, dec. Tansmer, thoneh hechinte him-
self necessirate d to mhat he pall do, yet if he do not thinte himsels
necessitated, and mound uptoimpenitence, there mill follon
upon his opinion of necessitu no imped ment to his repentance.
TheBimoD disputeth not acainst a. e, but acainst som body that
holas a man may repent, that belceves at the same time he can-
not repent.
COblerre Wrhac a delcripeion he hach siren ushere ot
Reventance. It is a glad returnins into the right may, after
the erief of beins ont ofthe may. Lcamared mero find elad-
nesseo beche trst mord in che descriocion oFrepentance.
Tcould never beof opinion that Christian repentance conld
beascribediothem, that had as y et no incentionto forsare their
fins andro leadanem life. Fse that erieves forthe evit that
hathhappened tohim for his sins, bat hach not a resolution +0
ober Gods Commandements letter for thetime tocome, erier
eth for his sufferines but noc for his doines, which no Divine
Tihinte will call Christian Repentance; but he that resol veth
upon ameudment of life. bnometh that there is forciveness for
himinCbrist Fesus, mbereos a Christian cannot possiblu bebut
etad. Before thic sladness there nas a crief preparative 10
RepenIABCE