# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0195
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0195?run=74
# Title: The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 163)
# Folio 195, page id 1030877386:0195
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1030877386&page=195
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1030877386/jpgs/default/00000195.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine
# Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.85
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

eL N.
bu
IA C1t.
e M
in dat
1
Ecause Z. FI. disarores chese ero distinctions, lhave jor.
redchem togecher in one parasraph. He likes nor chedi-
Cinction oFnecessiey or destins, ineo SevicalI and Christian,
nomore doI. Wessrecinche conclusion, BUE Oux mOtIreS
are diverse. Mprealonis, because I acknomleds no suchi ne-
cestiry, cicher as che one or asthe ocher, and because Icon-
ceire, chacchose Christian vriters, vho do justly decest che na-
Hed destiny ofche Scoicks, a5 Fearing eo FaII inco chole pro(s
absurdicies and pernicious consequences which ROW irom
chence, do vec pririly (choush perhaps umvirrinsly) under
anocher Form ot exprecion, incroduce ic asain ac che backdvor
aier cher tad openty cast ic out dE che toredoor: BuL Z. H.
rustrech boldlu wichone distinctions i’Wvtich Be aCCOUBES DUE
Jarson) and wichouc fore(ishe, nvon chc srossest celtinv oFall
ochers, chacis, chac ofche Scoich. He cor. Festeth, chac they
may bet otindsof doctri. e. May DC. ? Nar, chey are wichOUE
all peradrencure. And he hinselt is ehe ArIt Wwho beares che
name ot a Christion char L trave read, chac hach rarsed elis
Ilcexins Ciholt ouc oFies grove, and sec ic OUE in IES ErveCO-
lours. Bucyec he likes noc che names ot Scoicall and Christian
destiny, Ido noc biame him, choush he mould noc willinsy
be accounced. Scoick. To admic che chins, and quarrel aboue
chename, is eo mate our selres ridiculous. Why mishe nOcl
Firt callchac kind of destiny. which is maincained by Christi-
ans, Christian destins? and chac ocher maincained by Scoicks
Scoicall destins. d Buc Pam noc che invencer oF ehe ceAFI. IF
hehad beenas caretull in readins ocher mens opinions, a5 Be
is contidene in sertins doun his own, he mishic have Foundnoc
only che chins. Duc che name ic selE otcen ulec. Bur iF che name
otfarum Christianum, do oftend him, L et him call ic wicti
Lipsius, sarum verum, Who dirides destiny inco Four kinds;
2. Machematicall or Altrolosical deltins, 2. Nacural destins
3. Stoical or violene destiny; and 4. erue destins, which he calI5
ordinarily xostrum, our deltins; chac is, ot Christians, and fa-
tum pium, chac is sodly deltins, ane detnes ic iuA 25 T. H.
dochhisdeltiny, co be a series or order ot causes dependins
UPOF