# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0197
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0197?run=74
# Title: The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 163)
# Folio 197, page id 1030877386:0197
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1030877386&page=197
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1030877386/jpgs/default/00000197.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 46 lines, status machine
# Lines: 46 recognised, mean confidence 0.87
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

eiC
eoi
dom el
led
mcito
ibe
releat
Peeti
97
thaselah, but ie is not necellary chat hie MalI do (0, nOr prO.
bable chac hewill do (0. The productire pover ot Codis in
finice, bue che whole creared orid is finice. And cheretore
God mishe Aill producemore, iEic pleased him. Buc ehis ic
is, when men 50 on in a contused ray, and will admie no di
cinctions. IFT. H. had considered the difference Becween d
necellary beins, and a necessarz cause, or becween chole acti
ons oF Crod, Which are immanent michin him selF, and the tran-
sient morts ofCod, which are extrinsecalI wichoue himselF,
hemouldnerer hare proposed such an evident error, For a ma-
nitesteruch. Qui panca considerat, fasile pronuntiat.
Animadrertions upon cheRepli
Numb. Z V III.
TIF Bistop supposine Thad raken my opinion fromthe Au-
Lthority ofthe Stoict Philosophers, not frommy con Me-
ditation. falleth into dispure acainst the Scoiets, hereof mieht
is pleas a rake no notice, but passe over to Number 29. But that
he may bnom Phave considered their doctrine concernine Fate, L
thint fir tosay thus much, that their error consisteth not in the
Opinion OF Pare, bur in fairnine of a false Cod. When there-
foretheysay, Facum est estacum sovis, They say no more but
that Pace is the word oF Tupicer. I thcy had said it had beenthe
Wordof therrue Crod, TBould not have perceived any chine in it
10 contradict; because T bola as most Christians do, that the
Whole vorld ras madé; and is nom Croverne d by the WNord of God.
nhich brincetha necessier of allthines and actions to depend upon
the divine disposirion. or do I sec cause to find fault With that,
as he aoes) mhich is said by LipsuS, that (2) Fare is a leries
Or order oFcaules dependins upon the Dirine counsel, choustr
che Dirines choushiehe came to near ehem) Cas he thintes L
donor) And thereason iohy he vas caurelons, Was because be-
ine amember ofthe Pomist Church, he had litile confidence in the
judement, andlenirr ef the Romish C. lergie; and not becanse he
tonshe he had over. sot timsels.
6) Concernins che octer distinction of liberer in respect
OEche Airst cause, and liberey in respect of the secondcaules,
chouxli