# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0244
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0244?run=74
# Title: The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 163)
# Folio 244, page id 1030877386:0244
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1030877386&page=244
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1030877386/jpgs/default/00000244.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 41 lines, status machine
# Lines: 41 recognised, mean confidence 0.85
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

t
Animadversions upon tho Bictops
Reply Numb. X X II.
Ca, C) He chird pretence was out ofMoral Philolophy mil-
underttood, chac ourward objects de necellicare the
NNilI.) Tcannot imac ne how chequestion, hether outmard ob-
jects de necessitate or nat nec ssicare the Wil, can any siay bere-
ferredto Moral Philosophr. Lhe principles of moral Philosophy
are the LaWs. vbererith ommardbjects bave liile todo, as
beine for the most part inanima e, s huch follon alvayes theforce
of nature wittont respect to moral Lans Nor canL conceive rhat
purpose hehad robrine this into his Reply co my ansiver, wherein L
attribute nothine inthe Action o ourmard obgeits +0 Noralliry.
(b) CHis Arst excepcion is, thac ic is noc macerial cHaC thC
porver of ourmard objects de proceed fromour ovnfaules, is luch
faults os ours preceed noc from causes in our oon pover. WVelI.
buc whac ischer do proceed trom caules, chat arc in our omn
pover, as in cruch chey do, thien his anEver is a meer subcer-
FusC. B. + hem pr 2she that in truch they do: Becaule else, saith
he, che, are noc our Faules ac aII.) Very mell reasoned. A Forse
is lame frors a cause chat was not in his pov.r; therefore ihe lame-
nessis no faultinthe Forse. P ut his meani,e is, ta no injustice
uni. se che causes ivere in his conpover; as is it vere not injustice
whatsoever is nillinely aone acainst the Law, whatsoev rit be
that isthe cause o the Wil to do it.
5)) Neer he contestech chac ic is in our pover by g00d
endearours to alcer chose vicious habies etich wehad con-
tracted, and ro set checoncrarv habIEs There is no such con-
fession in myansm r. T said, Praver, Paltirs, Rc. May alcer
Ourhrabies. But Lnever said chat theWi ro Pray, Fast exc. is
in our von pover. Frue (Paih ne but then t’e contrary habit
doch nec. ssiiate rhe on. Vay, as Well as che former habit did l’eother
may. By wtich verr consideration ic appeors, chac chac wtich
he calIs a necestier, is no more buc a Proclivier. IFic vere à
erue neceltier, ic contd noc. be aroided, nor alcered by our
endearours.  Acain hemistates, for L Said that PlaY er, F a
AInZ, ec.
Ht
1
He
e