# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0262
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0262?run=74
# Title: The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 163)
# Folio 262, page id 1030877386:0262
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1030877386&page=262
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1030877386/jpgs/default/00000262.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 41 lines, status machine
# Lines: 41 recognised, mean confidence 0.85
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

(262)
rom, and so in like manner mich all che pares oPcime, beins il
selF WichouE parES. HC Pairh, He finds not these phrases in the
Scripeure. No, bue he may find chechins in the Scripeure.
chac Cod is infinite in all his aetributes, and noc capable ot any
imperfection.
And soeo ewhis ancipatty against che Sch0o.-men, thac
he hach no liberer or porer co concain himself, when he meers
wich any ofcheir phrases or cenets, he FalIS into another pa-
roxisme or Cc ofinreiphins acainst chem; And so concludes
his ansiver with a plandire co himlele, because he had de-
feaced boch my squadrons ot arsumenes, and reserres of di-
Rinctions,
Dicire Lo Paan,  Fo bis dicite Paan.
Bue because his eyc. Sghr was weak, and cheic backs vere
comards him, he quire mistook che. matcer. Those whom
hre la ronced and runnins avay vere his omn scactered
FOTCCS.
Animadrertions upon cheBistrops
RepIV, Numb. ZZIV.
(a) FT Elac poor discourse which Pmencion, was nor vritten
sainst any Dirines, bue in way cFexamination ota
French Trearise, _c. This is in Peply to those viords of mine,
chis discourse concaineth his opinion abour reconcilins Libe. Fy
wich che Prescience, and Decrees ot God, ochermise chex
Tome Dirines hare donc, against whom he had formeriy
Wrirten a Frearise.) I che French Frearise vere according 10
his mina, imhat need mas there that the examination ontabe
vricten? YF it vere not tohis mind, it mas in confutation of him,
chat is tosay, rrirten acainstthe Auchor ofit, unlesse perhaps
ehe Bisop thintes that he vorites not acainst a man, uniesse he
charee himmith blasphemys and Acheism, as hedoes me.
(6) TMy alterrion is molt erue chac we ouxhe nocto desert
a certain cruch, because we are noc able co comprehend che
Certain manner.) Tochis Lansmered that it vas erue, and, as he
alledsed it for a reason rhy he Boutd not benf my opinion, so L
alledsea
B
et
s
1