# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0267 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0267?run=74 # Title: The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 163) # Folio 267, page id 1030877386:0267 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1030877386&page=267 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1030877386/jpgs/default/00000267.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 39 lines, status machine # Lines: 39 recognised, mean confidence 0.93 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. (267) fustice is an Accident, one of the Moral verrues, and Wis dome anotber, hom 60d is an Accident or aloral vertue? Tis more then che School. men or Metaphysicians can understand; nhose vorirines have trouble d my head mere then thoy Bould have done, is Thad tnoron that amon est somans senselesse disput s, there bat been so fero lucide internable. Bat Lhave considered since, mhere men will underrake to reason onc of natural Philosophy, of the T comprehensible Wature of Cod, thar it is impossible chey sould speae incellisibly, or in other Languaze then Mecaphysique; herein; hey may contradict themselves. andnt perceave it; as he does here, henhesays, the Accribures ot Godarenoc di- verse Vercues or Qualicies in him, as they are in the Creatures, buc reallo one and che same wich ehe Dirine Fslence, and amonst chemselres, and accribured to C0d eo supply the de- fect oF our capaciey. Artributes are names andtherefore it is a contradiction, r0 Cay they are really one andthe same rith the Divine Fssence. But if he mean the Vernes sienifre d by the At. tributes, as Justice. Wisedome, Fternity. Divini: y. c. S0 also they are Ver. nes, and not one errue, (Which is still a contra- diction,) and me sive those Aetributes to Cod, not to sheW that me apprehend hou they are in him, but to sienifie hon me thinte it best tohonour him. (1) CInThenext place he mill help me ro understand (he says) hor Eterniey is an indivisible point. The Dirine substance is in- dirisible; Buc Fcerniey is che Dirine substance. TheMajor is eridene, because Cod is actus simplicissimus; The MinOE hach been clearly demonstrared in my ansiver eo his las doube; and is contessed by all men, chac wtracloever is acrri- tured to Codis Cod.) The Major is (o far frombeine evident, chat actus simplicissimus signiheth nothins. The Minor, is said by some men, thonche by no man; for rhat soever is thoucht, il anderstood; And al that he hath el se vohere and here dilare d upon it, is as perfect non sense, as any man ever vrit on purpose to mahe merry mith. And sois that vobereby he ansvers tomy ob- jection that a point cannot comprehend al time, rhich is successive; Namely, his distinction. Thac a poine doch noc comprehend, all Time formally, 25 Time is succestire; buc eminently and Vir- uallus, as Fcerniey is intinice. Andthis, To day all Erernicy