# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0272
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0272?run=74
# Title: The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 163)
# Folio 272, page id 1030877386:0272
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1030877386&page=272
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1030877386/jpgs/default/00000272.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 34 lines, status machine
# Lines: 34 recognised, mean confidence 0.90
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

2727
Or AealM. e Ce sne, Wihich alvares are in our pover, it ve
haretheule ofreason, or else ic is our omn Faule, thac they are
nOE in ou poer. Zec to such halty acts done in hoc blood,
che LaW isnor (0 serere, asto chole whicharc doneuxon lons
deliberation, and prepensed malice, unlels (a5I said) chere De
Tome mixeure of publick Justice inic. Ile that steals an itorse
deliberacet may be more putrichable by che Law, chan hechac
tillsche omner by Chance medley. Tec the deach ofche omner
Wras more noxious (couse his phrase) and more dammaseable
torhe Family, ehan che AcaleM of ehe HIOrsC: SOFaF WWaS T. FI.
Miltaken in chac also, chac etie righe eo tillmen, doch procced
neexly From choir beins noxious, Numb. 14.
Animadrections upon che Bistrope
Centiver to my opinion about
iberer and ccessur.
Numb. XXV.
(a) CD Ven nou he cellsuS, chac a manmay havetime to
Les deliberate, yet not deliberate. By and by heBaich,
chat no action of a man, thouch never so sudden, canbe said to be
Wiehout deliberation.) Fle thinles he hathbere carche me in a con-
tradiction. But he is mistaten; and the canse is, that he observed
not that ehere may be a difference berrocen deliberarion, and that
Which shali be construed for deliberation by aJndze. For a man
may doarah ast suddenty michour deliberation; yet because le
ourheto have deliberated, and had time enonch to deliberate ihe-
ther ehe action vere Laroful or rotsit sall not be said by the Judee
thac it nas Wirhont deliberation, mho supposetn that after the Lam
Kncron, all the time follomins nas time of deliberation. It is eliere-
fore no contradiction eo say a man deliberates noe, and that he
Ball De said eo deliberdre, by nim rhatisthe Fudse of voluntary
actions.
(6) CAcain, nhere he says, he matseth Voluneary and
SPOn