# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0283 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0283?run=74 # Title: The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 163) # Folio 283, page id 1030877386:0283 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1030877386&page=283 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1030877386/jpgs/default/00000283.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 37 lines, status machine # Lines: 37 recognised, mean confidence 0.92 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. 283) marteder denie bced ot; ascribins the necessication Ot aman in ilec actslots oun deliberation, and in indeliberate acts eohis last chonghe, Numb. 25. WVhacis chis eo a nacura and special inAtuence of extrinsecal causes (0) Again, Liberty (Taith he) is an absence of exerinsecal imded menci bue delibera- tion doch produce no new extrinsecal impediment, scheretore Clec him chose which part he will) cicher heis tree atcer desibe. racion, by his oon Doctrine, or he was noctree Betore. Oue oun deliberation, and ehe direction ot our oon understandins. andthe election of our onn will, do produce an hyporhecical necessier, chac che evene be such as ehe understandino hach di- rected, and the Will elected. Buc For as muchi as che understan- dins mistie hare directed ocherwise, and che willtrare elected ochermile, chiis is Far From an absolure necessier. Neicher doch liberey respect onely fucure acts, buc presene acts al(o. Ocher- Wise Cod did noc Frecly create the worid. In che same instane Wherein the willelectsic isfree, accordins eo a priorier oFNa- cure, choush noc ofcime, eo elect ochermise. And (o in a di vided sense, che willisfree, even whilestic acts, thouch in a compounded scuse ic benoc trec. Certainly, deliberation doct constiture, noc dettroy liberer. imacrersions upon che Ansiver 10 Numb. Z XVITI. (a) F P Elis Mort section mighe passe, bur tor emo chings. one is, thac he contounds a voluncary act wich a frec act.) Ido indeed rake all voluntary acts ro betree, and alt free actsto be voluntary, but mihal that allacts, Whether free or voluncary; if they be acts, vere necessary before they vere aCts. But rhere is the errour? A tree aet (saith he) is onely chae Which procceds tromthe frec election ofcherational WiI, afcer deliberacion; buc erery act chac procceds From thesensitire appecite ot man or beast ichone Deliberation or Flection, is eruely voluncarr. So that my errour lies in this that Y distin- suiso not betireen a rational Wil, and a sensirive appetite inthe In 2 Same