# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0312
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0312?run=74
# Title: The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 163)
# Folio 312, page id 1030877386:0312
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1030877386&page=312
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1030877386/jpgs/default/00000312.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 63 lines, status machine
# Lines: 63 recognised, mean confidence 0.79
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

(3
2
And nom hosaith it may becincoRCt os it etf. T he actien theresore
Desins co be Wirhont any cause mhieh he soid nothine conid do,
contradictins vehat hebad saia buc in the line before. And for thas
that he saith, thas many chinss may besin not wichout cause,
Due wichouea necessarr cause. It hathbcen aren dbetore; and
al causes have bien proved, if entire and sufficient causes) tobe
aecessary, and that mhieh he repeat th ber, namely, that a tree
cause mar choose histime when he will hesin to wock, and that
alchouchtrce cRects, cannoc betoretold, Decause rhey arenOE
certainsy predecermined in cheir causes, ec when chetree
causes do determine chemlelres, eher are Ot aS SrCAE CCKFAInE)
asthe octer, it has been made a pear sfficieraly bejore, that it is
bur Farson; the mords Free caule, and decermimins chemselses
beine insis asficans, and havins nothins inchemindos man nasrer-
able tothem.
Ck Cand nom chac I hare ansivered Y. TI. HiS ArGUMeNES
draun trom che prirace conceptions ormen concernins elle
sense ofrords, Pdesire him serwully eo examiine hunseil, _c.
One of his interrocatories is, t’is, Whrecher lfind noc bu expe.
rience chac L do manv chinss which lmixhe have lele undone it
Tvould. This quistion mas necalesse, b cause ai the may Lhave
granted him chat mon have Libe ey 10 a0 many cinc s ifchey nill,
Which chey lefr und ne, becansethey had not the Will co do tem.
Another imerrosatory is thes, Wtrecher l do riOE Fome ThIBOS
wichoue recara toche direction ot rishe reason, or serious re-
Spect oF Wtat is honelt or prosicable. This question mas in vain,
untesse herhinte insels ny Consessour. Anocher is Whecte
uric noc ehis desence asaiull Liberer, onelveo ow Twilthave
a Dominion overmv onnactions. Fothis lausrer, no: but
10 Bor Jhave no Doninion over my ill, andthis also at bis re-
quest; Bu all rhese questions serve in this place for nochine etse,
bur 1o deliver him os a esi he vas in labour mich all, aud tl. crefore
hes last question is, Wlerher l do noc Pomerimes Pay; Oh wtaca
Eool ras Ito cochus end ehus; or Oh chac T had been wise, or
Oh utrat a Fool vas Ico Erom old. Subrit questions, and full.
of Ppiscopat cravicy. L monid he had lefs ont chareinq me with
blasphemous, delperace, destructire, and Acheistec al opinions.
LBoula then bave pardoned him, his callins me (0ol, both becanse
Lde
nOt
Pitct
lib
hat
tb. 1
the
A62
+
pr
+
req
uit
1d
S.
Ir
Wo
has
cel
Othe
I1
it m
Me