# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0329
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0329?run=74
# Title: The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 163)
# Folio 329, page id 1030877386:0329
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1030877386&page=329
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1030877386/jpgs/default/00000329.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 37 lines, status machine
# Lines: 37 recognised, mean confidence 0.88
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

T. H.
ZD elius non sec bom rhe inconventences, rhi ch he ob- PTuM. 36.
L jecterh must follon, pon rhe holdine of necessirr, are avoided,
and ihe necessiry it sels demonstrarivel, proved. Z0wlien L conld
add, is Trhonche il 50od Logick, the inconvenience o) dergine ne-
cessiry, as that ic destroyes boththe Decrecs and Prescience of jod
Almichty; fer whatsoever Godhathp rposed to brins co pass by
man as an instrument, or fore scech it all come to passe, A v an is he
have Liberry. such as heaffirmeth from necessitarion, misht fru-
strare; and make not to cine to pass. And 60d Bould. it’er not
foretnon it andnot Decree it, or he Bouldioretenom such thines
Ball Beas Ball never be; and decree that hich sall never come
10 pass.
D.
Flnshe hach lahoured in rain eo laristie my reasons, and to
prore his onn assertion. Buc For demonstration chereis
nochins like ic amone his ArGUMEnES. NOn he CaICH; (a) BC
could add ocher arsumenes, it he chouxtir ic sood Losick.
There is no impediment in Losick, why a man may noc press
tis Adrersary ich chole ablurdicies whi ch AOW From his opi
on aArgumenrum ducens ad impolibl, Or, ad absurdum, 15 2
fo0d Form of reasonins. Buc chere is anocherrenson ot his
Forticarance, choush he Delochco exoressit. .-- Flaret lateri
larhalis arundo. Tle Argumenes deawn From the aerribu es oF
Cod do Cck Ca closeinthe sides oFhis cause, etrat he hach n0
mind co creat ot cirac ubject. By chewa, cakie nocice ofhis
oon conseltion, chac he couldaddother realons, il he hone t ie
eood Logic. F ic vere predecermned in elie ourward cAUIES,
elac he must make chis rerv detence and no octer, hon covldie
be in tuis poerco add or sbstroct any chirs. fuit as it a blind-
man Bhould ay in carnelt. conld sec, iFY had mine eres: Fruch
Otcer Bieaks vec. Whilsn en (cek to lother ic. (b) BuC leF US
viem tis A sumenc: IFa man hare libereo From necelliracur,
he may trust.ace cho Decrees Or Crirl, a:d mihe hs pecien e
Falie. Firt tor che Decrees ot Cod This I5 his Decrec, chac
man IEou Bea Free AGeVC; I hacsid constil.r 60, 45 a MoH
EiIrP. C