# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0336 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0336?run=74 # Title: The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 163) # Folio 336, page id 1030877386:0336 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1030877386&page=336 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1030877386/jpgs/default/00000336.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 40 lines, status machine # Lines: 40 recognised, mean confidence 0.90 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. (336) eo conceire ot God ashe is, ehe readiest way wehrave, is bure. moorins all chat imperfection trom Cod, irtuch 15 in ehe crea- cures. Sowecallhim Intinice. Immorenl, Indevendent. Or by accribucins eo him allchose perfections. Wtich are inche creatures afcer a molt eminene manner. (0 ve call him B. H. Crreacest, most Wile, moct sult. mostHolv. (c) Bur iaichhe, When they dispute of Gods actions Philosophically, then they consi- der themacaim, as if hehad such faculcies, and in che manner as W havethem. And is chis che caule ot our errour: Thacvere strange in- decd, For chey utio dispute Philolophically ot Ciod, de neither alcribe Faculcies to tim in chat manner chac ne have chem, Nor vec do cher accribute anv proper faculcies at all 10 Ccd. 61045 Underttandins, andhis Willis his very F Nence, wtich Forche eminency ot its intinice pertection, doth pertorm ali chose chinssalone, in a molteranscendent manner. Which realonable creatures do pertorm impertectiy, by distinct faculces Thus eo dilpuce of Cod ich modetty, and reverence, and coclear cheDciry Fromcheimpucarion ofcyranny, injultice, and disti- mularion, wtich none. do chrou upon Ciod wirti more pre- sumprion, chan choseprho are che Pacrons ot absolute necesti. cy, is boch comcle and Chrictian. Icis noc che desire co dilcorer che orisinal of a suppoled ex. rour, Which drames chem ordinarily inco chele exclamarions again chose who dispuce otche Veicy. For same oF chem- selves dare anacomise Cod, and publith his Lcernal Decrees ich as much contidence, as if ches had been all cheir lives oF his cabinet conncel. Buc ic is For lear, lest chole pernicivus consequences, Which Row trom thac doctrine essentiallo and refect in so hishr a desree upon che supreme goodnels. Mould he laid open eo the riem ot the morid; suit asthe TurkS 40, First establisti a Fasse Relision ofcheir omn deriline, and chen Forbid all men uxon pam of deach eo dilpure upon ReligiOn; Orasche Pciests oF Solech; the Abhomnacion ofrhe Ammo- HICCs) did, make a nore with cheir rimbrells all the while che Poor Intanes vere paltins chroust chetire i Fophit, EOReCD cheir picitul cries From che ears otcheir PArENES: S0d) ches matie a nvise icli cheir declasariOuS a Sailt ChOIC, ito dure dispure