# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0343
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0343?run=74
# Title: The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 163)
# Folio 343, page id 1030877386:0343
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1030877386&page=343
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1030877386/jpgs/default/00000343.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 40 lines, status machine
# Lines: 40 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

(343)
Family to discharee as ofren as he san scecause, the Schoet Ma
sers he enterraineth io teach his Children. Is the Bisop and Dr.
Hammond when they did rrire in desenceofthe Churchof Fns.
lan d acainst imputation of Schisme, quicrins their oon pretences of
jurisdiction and sus dirinum, had cone upon these principles of
mine, they had not been so sremdly handled as they have been by
an Engliß Papist, that rrote acainst them. And no P have done
ansverins tohis Areuments. TBali here in the end os all tabe that
Liberys of censurine his nbole B00k, wbich le hathtaten, in the
becinnine, of censurins mine. Prave saith he. Numb. I. perused
T. LI. his ansmers, considered his reasons, and concludehehath
missed, and mistaid ste question, that his ansmers are evasions,
that his Arsuments are P’aralosilmes, and that theopinion os ab-
solure and universal necessity is but a resuleof some cronnaless,
and ill chosen Principles. And nem it is my turniocensure.
Ana first. for thestrensihoflis. iscourse, and lenomledee of the
point in question. Lthinke it muc inscriour, rothat which micht
have been nrieten by any man livir. E. that had no orber learn-
ins besides the ability to re his mind; but as meli perhaps as the
Same man vould have done it is ro the ability os vririne his mind.
he had auded the stndy of School. Divinity. Secondly, forthe man-
ners of it (for to a publicle erritine there belonseth cood manners)
it consisterh in railins and exclaimins aud scurrilons jestine, with
nov and thenap unclean; andmean instance. And lastly for his
elocution, the verrue whereof lieth not in the flux of mords but
in perspieuity. Et isthe same Langnace with that of the Kinsaome
of Darteness. One Ball find in it, especially vhere he sould speate
most closely iothe question, such vords as these; Dirided lenle
Compounded sense, Ayporherical necessicy, Liberty OFFXer-
cise, Liberey os specification, Liberey oF contradiction, Liber.
ey oFconcrarierr, Knomledse oF approbation, Practical knon-
ledse, General inAuence, Special inAuence, Instinct, Qualities
insuled. Fficacious election, Moral esticaer, Moral mocion.
Mecaphorical morion, Practice practicum, Mocus primo primis
Actus elicici, Actus imperari, Permissive will, Consequene will.
Pesacire obduracion Deticient cause, Simple act. Nunc Ctans, es
other like mords ol non-sense divided besides many propositions such
as th. se, The Willis che Mistris oFhumane Actions, Phe under.
ctandins