# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1045795771:0363
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1045795771:0363?run=74
# Title: DIALECTICAE || EMENDATAE || LIBRI DVO || IN QVORVM HOC PRIORE CONTI-||nentur praecepta Dialectica ex optimorum autorum,|| praecipuè Aristotelis, P. Rami, et Ph. Melanchthonis || sententijs, vsu#́[que] rationis eruta ... || PRAETEREA ADIECTVM EST TRI-||plex controuersiarum logicarum iudicium; vnum de || logicis quibusdam P. Rami erratis; aliud de antiramaeo-||rum friuolis quibusdam obiectis; & tertium de demon-||stratione Aristotelaea quae contra P. Rami impe-||tum solidè defenditur & explicatur;|| studio || MED. D:|| et Poetae Caes.|| (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 141, Stück 1; Leibn. Marg. 141)
# Folio 359, page id 1045795771:0363
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1045795771&page=363
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1045795771/jpgs/default/00000363.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 59 lines, status machine
# Lines: 59 recognised, mean confidence 0.77
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

0
cei
rer
ac
CMI
l. C
Ma
IMI
Eri
aced
sti
diu
pote
MISC
Mim
uent
vine
em. 1
end
ped
olet
idelt
IOI
ed
tun
IN DTALEOT. D. RAML. 359
Fundamencum disposirionis ad instiruen-
dum iudicium solidum apparerent. Sed
Festinac Ramus; ex relinquie discipulo co-
sicanda reliqua. Ira inhdelis rix est Ai-
Koccles.
Concradictio definitur quidé in EranS- Contradi
curlus edno diniditur, qualiperperuoFo- ctio.
recrniulmodi. Debacchaturaure hic Ra-
meiralde in oppolitiones axiomaticas A-
ristotelis, purancq; nullu rlum esse corra-
dicerium, contrarioru ee lubalcernorum.
Acphilolophus adhibuiccaideo, reiudi-
Odsn
nes.
ciurericacis ampliaretur. Iam omneco-
cradictorium alceri opposicum distinguie
verua Fallo, sive ita reCtatimrnuscveru,
alcerutalsum; lue ica, ve veroq; Fallo, Tub-
alECFHAVEFAQ; argUatUEVera; dECONETA ex
vercq; lubalterna rera, arguatur oppolita
generalia Falla. Hlic fructus non estnullus.
quanquam eum non agnolcunt Ramxi,
ee tamen pracerire non pollune dum ali-
cubinotant, quod contradictiohaec, illa,
diuidacverum a Fallo.
Fs d hocanimaduertendu, quod pre-
ceptum de contradictioneno sic catholi-
cum, i nara rarros. Nam in lubalcernis
negacur idem vinculum ae aHtirmatur; ac
nulla Aciudicio Ramaorum cotradictio;
ve: Ouoddam animalloquitur: Quodda ca
AIaLNOLOGLIEAE. ANMOTALInCEEPICSC2 C
hie