# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1045795771:0451
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1045795771:0451?run=74
# Title: DIALECTICAE || EMENDATAE || LIBRI DVO || IN QVORVM HOC PRIORE CONTI-||nentur praecepta Dialectica ex optimorum autorum,|| praecipuè Aristotelis, P. Rami, et Ph. Melanchthonis || sententijs, vsu#́[que] rationis eruta ... || PRAETEREA ADIECTVM EST TRI-||plex controuersiarum logicarum iudicium; vnum de || logicis quibusdam P. Rami erratis; aliud de antiramaeo-||rum friuolis quibusdam obiectis; & tertium de demon-||stratione Aristotelaea quae contra P. Rami impe-||tum solidè defenditur & explicatur;|| studio || MED. D:|| et Poetae Caes.|| (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 141, Stück 1; Leibn. Marg. 141)
# Folio 447, page id 1045795771:0451
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1045795771&page=451
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1045795771/jpgs/default/00000451.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 60 lines, status machine
# Lines: 60 recognised, mean confidence 0.76
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

Recti
ViErI
aller
ciamt
umme
i l
us mraritu
Ueuon
EAh. cas
81 8. 1 au 21
rtrepn
u, BC. I1.
oblicaqu
dembnua
C oet ini
nstraum
aquillo
i delit
exbiani
rbiue
ell
ralim
eipits st
eac inel.
UadiM B.
plpliet
pevet
CONPRA SENTEN. D. R AML. 447
dicis, quibus phylica Cunc Cubalteenaz
Iea cum in speciali arris membro ali-
quid repero ex generali. Leaque videac
Ramus ne contra mencem Aristorelis
et rsum arriticem reculas sciencihicas
nimis rusticereseat. Sedmissishis, ex-
curiamus argumenta quibus Petrus Ra-
mus Aristotelicam demostrationem op-
purnanit.
Primum es ciulmodi. NequC MatC- L. Arg. R~
ria est (inquit) neque Forma eiusfyllogi- mi.
Imi, quem demonstrariuum vocat Ari-
Aoceles. Nam reddinon porestcoulacur
proprium aasos insit lubiecto, re de ei-
su, cur scinhomine, de ita deratione. Si
quis obriciac per organa polle relpon-
deri; negat hoc argumento Catistreri,
quia non possit dari causa cur in homi-
ne hoc porius sic quam in alio animan-
ce, sicur nec cur homo homo sic porius
quam beltia, licet organa dari possine.
Deinde ex iplo Aristorele inACIaEUE AF=
oumencum eius quaestionis inveniripol-
lc. Vulc enim is propriam affectionem
Cubiecto per scinesse: ergonon peraliud,
quod evenirec E inveniretur aroumen-
cum. Insupernegat cudem philolophum
ullam calem afferre poruisle rationemnile
ridiculam, ex ineptam. Requeira materia
demonstrationis oppuonat. Formavero
tre
ad