# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1045795771:0475
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1045795771:0475?run=74
# Title: DIALECTICAE || EMENDATAE || LIBRI DVO || IN QVORVM HOC PRIORE CONTI-||nentur praecepta Dialectica ex optimorum autorum,|| praecipuè Aristotelis, P. Rami, et Ph. Melanchthonis || sententijs, vsu#́[que] rationis eruta ... || PRAETEREA ADIECTVM EST TRI-||plex controuersiarum logicarum iudicium; vnum de || logicis quibusdam P. Rami erratis; aliud de antiramaeo-||rum friuolis quibusdam obiectis; & tertium de demon-||stratione Aristotelaea quae contra P. Rami impe-||tum solidè defenditur & explicatur;|| studio || MED. D:|| et Poetae Caes.|| (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 141, Stück 1; Leibn. Marg. 141)
# Folio 471, page id 1045795771:0475
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1045795771&page=475
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1045795771/jpgs/default/00000475.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 53 lines, status machine
# Lines: 53 recognised, mean confidence 0.77
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

D
iadi
nede.
edico.
entgu.
CoI
Cllano
or
tione
Mi IIII
Med.
q. dect.
VM C
tua
ed
2I
elii
Petere
ereu
CONTRA SENTEN. P. R AMT. 471
Dui roon concludit in quaestione sic 2l.
is concluditrem priusconfessam, (3 po-
sitam.
Sed qui in quaestione sia  syllosistice con-
cludit is roori concludit.
Frgoremprius confessam, (5 sic actum a-
sit non docens, quod docere debebat.
Relpondetur reante; contellum quidé
raga nociria concludi, sed non scicum an-
cequam per caulam concludererur. Ante
noucracindehnite rohrrtatum; pottcon-
clusione certus est de de siori, de limulno-
uichoc symperalma esse peaecepeu scien-
cificum, Ccu doetrinam immocam.
Ramus aure hoc praeuidic. Itaq; ITaOC- Prolepsis
cupec. Dicat aliquis, inquit: Pucctors COn- Rami.
cludicur, cum argumentum Fuerie detint cc
cio releaula proprer quam res est, Propria ca
enccellaria. Atillud ipsenegac, qa detnt- cc
tionenontantu ctore, led de omne genus a
quaestionupossic explicari. Nonitaq: Ca- cc
rimrbi detinicio velcaula propria cA, rdc.
Pori conclulum existimandu est. SedR a- 1
mus aperre delirar. Si detinitione omne
genus questionu porest concludii poterie
e sorii idg; cum alias, cum in demonstra-
tione rbi quarieur sciencia proprieraris
in subiecto. Aristoreles nunquam alliga-
uic loctor, ad Cola apodictica. POlTunt e a-
lia quaeriper idem. Ita nec quaeAiO a
68 4
nCC
Resp.