# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1045795771:0476
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1045795771:0476?run=74
# Title: DIALECTICAE || EMENDATAE || LIBRI DVO || IN QVORVM HOC PRIORE CONTI-||nentur praecepta Dialectica ex optimorum autorum,|| praecipuè Aristotelis, P. Rami, et Ph. Melanchthonis || sententijs, vsu#́[que] rationis eruta ... || PRAETEREA ADIECTVM EST TRI-||plex controuersiarum logicarum iudicium; vnum de || logicis quibusdam P. Rami erratis; aliud de antiramaeo-||rum friuolis quibusdam obiectis; & tertium de demon-||stratione Aristotelaea quae contra P. Rami impe-||tum solidè defenditur & explicatur;|| studio || MED. D:|| et Poetae Caes.|| (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 141, Stück 1; Leibn. Marg. 141)
# Folio 472, page id 1045795771:0476
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1045795771&page=476
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1045795771/jpgs/default/00000476.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 35 lines, status machine
# Lines: 35 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

33
472
PRODEMONST. ARISE,
nec nsinec on sr Tolius est apodirios: led
in hac per iltas peculiari adhibitione que
ritur; ex exmateria spectatur, quado lunt
apodicicae, ex quandonon.
Occurrit aurem ille, dicitqi ethomnes
o quaectiones possine detinitione ee caula
explicari, camen non esse omnes syllogi-
oCicasinec omnes eodem Gllogilmocon-
3 Cludi: quia HSccocum sEnoericum; oru (-
o3 mul e Gilogisticum e noericum: e
quamuis idem lumen argumenti adhibe.
acur in qualtionibus omnibus, negat ca
 men eandem quaectionem esse quae illu-
minacur, e eiusdem rei scientiam conti-
ci; quia immediaci aegumenei cognitio
Aristoceli appellecurros; explicata rero
indereicoonitio scientia deres quae qua-
ricur, ve sic rei quaelica de explicatae co-
nonitio sicdiverla. o aut dici nucscientia
nargumetiapodictici ex principii, led qua-
sionis quae inde Armac: e scientia specié
actimandam elle ex quaestione. Hlacille.
Accendendum eAquidnam libi relit.
Obiectio priorerac, quod intelligendum
sc cunc siori concludi cum definitio vel
caulaprosarsumento eslumca. Negabat
hocRamus, quia detinitio explicer etiam
alias quaestiones, nempe a 6ts, 116  olibI.
Non ergo rbi detinicio est, sacim inte-
rendum est, Jo son esse. Diximus, nonin-
tractum
Ress.