# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0107
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0107?run=74
# Title: A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 137, Stück 2; Leibn. Marg. 137)
# Folio - , page id 1066511403:0107
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1066511403&page=107
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1066511403/jpgs/default/00000107.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 69 lines, status machine
# Lines: 69 recognised, mean confidence 0.91
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

CHAP. 1.
first Inventour of this Reomical PhyHO.
loor, briesty suecested.
PaBC 12
X. That this Mosetus, the Inventour
Contairine an Account oE the Aomick of the Aromical PhysioloeY, mas Proba-
Physoloer as made the Fonndation bly the same with Mochus the Physcolocer
Olthe Atheistick Fate, Or the Materi- in Tamblichus; mith whose Successours,
al Necessity OF all Thines.
I. I D IEIR F F FataliSIMS; COr, THC
Priests and Prophets, Pychagoras con-
vers d at Sidon.
ibid.
ZI. Other Probabilities for this that
NeceTEY of alt Fluman AEti- PvehacOraS ivas acquainted with the A-
ons and Fvents, maintained comiek Phyholoo.
apon Three severat Crounds) which are XII. That PythasOraS his NOnacs
se many False Fypotheles, of the Incel- vere sometimes taten for Corporeal A-
lectual Syltem of the Clniverse. PagC3
TI. Concernine the Mathematical, or
ACtrolosical Fate.
tOmS; From Fephantus in Scobaus and
Aristocle.
ibid.
XIII. Proved clearty that Empedo.
TII. Os the Opinion of those who sup- cles, who mas a Pythacorean, Phytiolo.
Posed a Fate Superiour to the Hishest sized Atomically.
Ocuer.
XWV. The same further evinced, front
N. The Moderation of the Intended Plato, Arictorie and Plucarct.
Discourse, concernins Liberty and NC-
cectur.
6
XV. That AMAXASOFAS, (Senior toDC.
mocritus,) vas a Spurious or Bungline
V. The Acheistical Ayporhesis, on Acomist, and an Instilsull Imitatour of
Demoeritick Fate, as founded upon the (that PhytioloBY, before in use.
Acomick PhytolOBY; Which therefore
briestr Described.
VI. The Antiquitu os ehis Atomick
Ptryholoor, withthe Account siven there-
of by Aristocle.
8
16
XVI. That LCphancus the Pythaeore
an ZenOcrateS, Diodorus and MetrO-
dorus Chius, vere al Ancient Asserters
of the RComick PhyHOIOS; tocether
with Aristocles Testimony, That ihe Ce
VII. A clear and full Record of the nerality of Former Phytiolozers vent
Same Phrsiolop in Plato, not commonty
taken notice of.
10
VIII. That neither PEOtASONAS, non
that way.
ibid.
XVII. Hom Aristorle is 10 be recon-
ciled with himsels, and the Credit of e
Demoeritus, nor Lcucippus, nor any ther Writers 1o be Salved, When they im-
Acheit, was the first Inventour or F’onn- pute this Philosophy 10 L CucippuS and
der of this Atomick PhyColoey: and Democritus; That these vere the first
the Necessity os beine thoronehly acquain- Acheizers thereof, and consequentir the
led theremith in order to the Confutation Founders of that Philosophy, which is
of the Modern Acheisin.
Er Acheistically Acomical.
IX. The Fradition os Posidonins ihe XVIII. That the Rcomils before De
Stoick that Molehus an Ancient Phce moexituS, vere Asserters of a Dcicy and
nician, besore the Trojun Narr, was ihe Subltance lucorporeal.
XIX. A