# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0108 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0108?run=74 # Title: A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 137, Stück 2; Leibn. Marg. 137) # Folio - , page id 1066511403:0108 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1066511403&page=108 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1066511403/jpgs/default/00000108.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 103 lines, status machine # Lines: 103 recognised, mean confidence 0.91 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. Lhe Contents. XIX. A Confutation ds those Neote- XXXI. That ihe Doctrine os Dre exi ricks, oho deny Incorporeal Substanee. Rence and Fransmipration of Souls, hac 1o have been asserted by any of the An- cients. The Antiquity of that Doctrine proved from Plato, nho also prosessealy maintained it. PaeC 18 XX. Aristorle litervise an Apserter os Incorporeal Substance. 1c XXI. That PpicuruS consuleth Ibis Opinion as that rohich hac been before maintained by Placo and other Ancients. 20 XXII. That alt ihose Dhilosophers, robo before Placo, hela the Immorcalier oF che Soul, and a Deiey Dictinet fron the vorid, vere undonbredly Incorporealists; es particularius Pychagoras, nho also maintaned a Frinier of Dirinc ErpO Aa(C5. ibid. ZXIII. Parmenides, a Strenons AS serter of Incorporeal Substance, 1ocet her with those reho held, That al thines did not PIOW, but some thines Stand. 23 XXIV. Empedocles vindicated front beine either an Acheist, or Corporealict, et laree. ibid. XXV. AMAXAGOTAS, an open and pro- fessed Asserter of an tncorporeal Minc. 26 XXVI. Inserred front al Ibis, Lhat IBC Ancient Rcomicts before Democricus, vere both Theists and Incorporealists: and this further consirmed. ibid. also ihe same Orisinal. PasC 38 XXXII. This not Consined by those Ancients 10 Human Souls onely, but FX tended 10 alt Souls and Lires whatsoever. XXXIII. AI ihis proved from Pmpe- docles, who plainty asserted the Pre exi- Rence, as vellas the Post existence of alt Souls, from this Fundamental Principle That Nochins ean come trom Nochins. nor soc eo Nochins. XXXIV. A Censure of this Doctrine, That from this Ciround may be solidly pro- ved, ihe Puture Immorcalier of Puman Souls, but not their Pre exictence: be- cause all Souls must be Created by God, some time or other. XXVII. TBat ebere is not onelys no In- XXXV. An Hy pothesis to Salve the In- corporeier of the Souls of Brutes, with ont iheir Post exictence, and Successive Franciniorations. XXXVI. And, That this will not Pre- jndice the immorcalier of Duman SoulS. XXXVII. But that the Fmpedoclean Eyporhesis, is indeed of tho Two, more Rational, than the Opinion of those, nho matie the Souls of Bruces all Corporeal. ibid. XXXVIII. Moreover, that ibe Consti- intion of the Aromical Phy HOIOBY, is consisteney, betroixt Acomolor and such in it sels, asthat rmhosoever tintertains Theoloer, but also a Natural Coenation- proved from ihe Orixin ofrhe Acomical Phyholoer, which procceded in seneral From the Vietory and Triumph of RCaIOn 27 it iboronehly understandine the same must necds hola Incorporeal Substance ; in Live Parriculars. AC XXXIX. Tivo great Advantages of the Acomical or Mechanical Phy(olO8Y; ZXVIII. A more Particular Acconnt ihe First wbereof is ihis, That it renders over Sene. of ihe Orixin of ihis Acomical PhiloCo. ihe Corporeat morid Incelligible, which Phy, Sron that one Principle OEReaCOn, no other Philosophy doth. XL. The Second Adrancase of il Phat in Nature Nochine comes trom Nochins, nor soes co Nochins. And that it prepares an easy and clear may, for ibat ihe ancient Acomolo mas bnilt up. ihe Demonstration of Incorporeal Sub- ibid. on this F’oundation, proved at laree. 29 XXIX. That this sels Same Principle, AanCC. XL. I. Concluded from al these Premil- which made ihe Ancient Acomicts discard Ses, That ihe Aneient Molchical Philolo Oualicies and Substantial Forms, made Phiy, vas Integrated and Made uD of them also assert Ineorporeat SuBTTanCC. 35 these Trvo P’arts, Acomical Phy (OlOSY, XXX. And with it immorcalicy OE and Theoloey or PneumatoloBY. Sou15. 50 XL. II. But that this Fntire Philosophy, vas