# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0122
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0122?run=74
# Title: A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 137, Stück 2; Leibn. Marg. 137)
# Folio - , page id 1066511403:0122
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1066511403&page=122
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1066511403/jpgs/default/00000122.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 78 lines, status machine
# Lines: 78 recognised, mean confidence 0.90
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

PBC CONFeNLS.
Bac anc PabulOus, hac another ArCANC( That some of those old Hermaick BOOlS
and Recondire Theoloer. Their Sphin- remained in the Cnstody of the Leypcian
res, and HarPOCrALCS, or Sigalions, in Priests, sill ihe times of Clemens AIex-
their Temples.
PaBC314, 315
This Areane Theoloer of ibe LExpri
ancleins.
PaBC333
Hermaicl BOOlS taken notice of for-
anS, concealed front ihe Vulear trvo man- merty, not onely by Chrictians, but also
ver o(ere bp Alleoories and Hierorlr- by Papans and Philo(ophers. Tamblichus
pticks. This donbrless a Lind of Meca- his Testimony of them, that they did Re-
physicks concernine God, as One Pertect ally contain Hermaical Opinions, or L
Beine ehie Orixinal oF aII chines. 316 8)Pcian L carnins. Fisteen of these Her-
An Objection from Chaeremon, (cited maiele Booles publisbed toeether at A-
by Porphurius in an Epistle to AnebO ChenS before S. C yril 5 1imC. 324, 325
AI ihe Philolopty ofthe Present Her-
an Forecian Priest.) fully ansivered by
Tamblichus in ihe l’erson of Abammo, in maicle BOOlS not meerty Orccanicle, as
317, 318 Casaubon assirmeth. Thac Nochins pC-
That Monarchy mas an Essential Parr risheth; old Poyprian PhiloCophy, de-
his Ferpcian Myceries.
ofthe AreanC and True Theoloer ofthC rived by Prchacoras tocether with the
Franlmigration os Souls, into Oreece.
Lerpcians, may be proved fromihe Pril
mexisticke Wricines; ihoneh not al
326, 327
The Aselepian Dialogue, or Pertect
Genmine; Ces ihe Pamander, and
Sermon in ibe Nount concernine RC- Oration, (Said to have been transtate d in-
Generation) Because thoneh they hact been 10 Lacin by Apuleius) vindicated from
328
all Forged by Christians never so much, beine a Christian Porrers.
An ansiver to tmo bjections made a
vet beine divulced in ihose Ancient times,
ibey must necds have somethine of Truth sainst it: the latier whereof from a PrO-
in ibem; ihis at least, That ihe Lerpci- Pheeyratien notice of by S. Ausin; That
the Temples os the Perprian Crods, Bould
ans acteromledeed One Supreme Deicy,
or olhermise they mould have been present- sorrly be CuII OFche Sepuletres os dead
ibid.
sy Fxploded.
379, 320 Men.
That Calaubon, frons ihe Detection of
Petavius his further Suspicion of For-
Forcery in 1wo or three at most ofthese cery becanse as Lactamcins and S. Auctin
Primesistick BoOkS, does not Reasona- have affirmed, the Chrictian L08O5 is
biy infer ihem 1o have been all Chrictian Berein called a Sccond Cod, and the
CheaES: Ihose also not Fxceptedt, that First Begoren Son ot Ood. lhe An-
have been ciled by Ancient Fathers, bul siver, ibat Lactantius and S. AuCtin
since lost.
320, 321
That ihere Was one Theuch or ThOCM,
vere clearty Mistaten, this beine there
(called by ihc Crecks HErmCS) an In-
assirmed onely of the Vilible and Sensible
Worid.
329, 330
That besides the Aselepian Dialogue,
ventor of Fetters and Sciences amonest
ihe Ancient Lerpcians, not reasonably 1o otbers osihe present Frismesicticke BOOlS.
bedoubred. Desides rohom, ibere is said contain L∞yptian Doctrine. Nor can
1o have been a Sccond Hermes, Cirnamed they be alt proved 1o be Spurious and
Trismesist, obo lest many Volumes of Counerteit. This the rather insisted on
Ptrilosophy and Theoloey behind hin, for ihe indication of the Ancient l’a-
331, 332
that ivere commilted 1o the Cnstody of ihC ibers.
Priests.
Proved that ihe PErprianS, besides
Oiber Bools also rorisen by Fxrprian their Many Cods achromledé ed Ouc
321, eC.
Priests, in several Aees successivetu Firs Supreme, and Univeral Deucy,
called Hermaieal, Cas lamiblichus infor- from the Festimonies of Plucarch, HOrus
meth us) becanse Entilled (PTO mOre) APOllo, lamblictus, Cassirmine that Her-
1o Hermes, as the President OF L carrine. mes derived all thineS, even MALLEL it sels,
322 from One Divinc Principle) lastly of
Damaleius