# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0144
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0144?run=74
# Title: A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 137, Stück 2; Leibn. Marg. 137)
# Folio - , page id 1066511403:0144
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1066511403&page=144
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1066511403/jpgs/default/00000144.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 73 lines, status machine
# Lines: 73 recognised, mean confidence 0.90
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

The Contents.
racion ofhe ancien Cabbala ofihC Fri-IAian Friniey, vet nothine of plain Con-
PayC 556, 557 tradiction 10 Leason thereim; that is, no
This that Placonick, or rather Pscudo. Nonsense, and impostibiliey. The II
nier.
Placonicke Frinier, by us opposed 10the Desien ofthose mho represent ihe Christi-
Chrictian; vir. such a Triniey, as con- an Priniey as absolutely Contradictions 10
founds the Dilterences betroixt Cod and RCaIOn, that they may thereby debauck
ihC Creature; bringine iheDei, by de mens Onderstandines, and matie them
erees, doron lorver and lorver, and at sivallom doron other thines mhich unque-
leneth scalterine it into alt ihe Anima stionably are such.
ced ParIS of ihCNNorid; A Foundation
PaBC560
The Chrictian Prinier much more a-
for Intinice Polycheilim, Colmolater or erceable 1o Reason, ihen the P Ceudo- P la-
WVorid-Idolacrr, and Creacure. Worthip. conicte, in the Threc Particulars before
Hlence ihe Placonists and PychaBOrCANS, mentioned. First, ils matine their Third
the Liltest men 1o be Champions for Pa-) FIypoctalis the Animated WV orid, or Mun-
sanim acainst Chrictianier. 557, 558
dane Soul. Which, not oncly 100 ereat a
Concernine he Christian Priniey, Threc Lcap betroixt the Second and Third
thines 10 be Observed. First, that it is but also a eross Debasement of the DCiey,
not a Friniey of meer Names and Words, and Contoundine it rithche Creature;
nor LoricaIl NOciOnS, or Inadequate a Fonndation for WVorld-Idolater, and
Conceptions of God: ihis Doetrine worstippine Tmanimare ThineS, as P IIIS
havine been condemmed by ihe Christian and Members oF Ood.
Chureh, in Sabellius and others; but a
Triniey of Hypostales, Subsictences, or
ibid.
God 10 Origen, but quasi Anima
Mundi, AS it vere the Soul oF che
Worie and not Fruly and Properly such.
Ihe Second tbine Observable in ihc AIL ihe Perfection of ibis Nocion 1o be al-
558,559
Persons.
Christian Prinier. Thas thoreh the SC- tributed 10God but not the Imperfection
cond Hypocta(is thereos vere Becolten thereos.
Trom ite Pirs, and ihe Third Proceed
560,561
Certain that accordine 1o the more re-
eth both from the Firc and Second; vet sinedt Placonists, their Third Dirinc Hy-
neither ofthem CreAEuTeS. First, becanse POsta(IS, not a MundanC, but SUIPFL- MUIM
not Made eE Un ErTaV, Or frON an ANCCCC dane Soul, and the duusprds or OpIHICCF
dene Non existence broneht Forth into of the wtiole Worid. 50 10 Amelius.
Beine. bnt borh of them Coccernall ith P’orphrrius, and PIOtinuS. A Double
ihe l’acher. Secondly, becanse alt NC-
cellarilu existene, and Cln- AnnihilabIC.
Thircly, becanse alt of them UnivertalI
or Intinice, and Creatours of all otter
Parcicular BCinES.
559
Soul os ihe Worid to Placo likemise. The
Third FIypostalIs, 10 these, no Creature,
562
but a CFCALOUT.
S0 intheir Second Particular, (where-
by ihe forementioned PCeudo. Placonicle
Frinier, no Triniey) ils mahine all the
TheTBird Observable a5 1oihe Christi-
an Triniey, That ihe Threc Hypoctases Ideas and ArchetypAl ParacIBMS O)
thereos are all Truly and Really One Cod; thines, so many Hypoctales, Animals,
not onely by Rcason of AOTCCENE OF and CodS. This a Monstrons LXtrava
WilI but also of a MucuaII MEPIZCCNOIS Caney. Not 10 be doubred, but that Plato
and et sapES Permeation of each other, welt understood these Idea 5 to be Nothine
and lnexiltence. Thoueh no Instance of bnt NOCmata or Conceptions of the DI
ihe like Uniy 10 be found elserohere in vine Mind, existine no mhere apart b7
Nacure; ret since rodistinet Substances, themselves; borever called soicet, lil
Corporeal, and Incorporeal, male one Man lenees or Substances, becanse not such AC
and Person in our Selves; much moremay cidental and Lvanid thines as our tu
Threc Dirine Hypostates be Onc Ood. mane Thouxtusare, they beine ihe SCan-
ibid. dins and Eternall Objects of alt Selence:
Thoueh much of MyAery in ihe Chri- As also Cda or Animals; 10 sienify that
they