# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0146
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0146?run=74
# Title: A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 137, Stück 2; Leibn. Marg. 137)
# Folio - , page id 1066511403:0146
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1066511403&page=146
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1066511403/jpgs/default/00000146.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 64 lines, status machine
# Lines: 64 recognised, mean confidence 0.89
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

IhC Contents.
suase hre Oider ihem Proclus. Nor Ciceros Oods by whose Providence ihC
does Placo speak of any ABAraCE or SCPA. Worid and all ils Parrs vere framed.
race Mind, save onely One: His Sccond
chines abont the Sccond, beine Idc2S; as
PaBC572, 573
The Seeond Aypoctasis in Llacos Pri-
his Thirds abont the Third Created BC- niey, to vit, Mind or Incellect, unquestio
ines. Plocinus also donbi full and stacee- nably ETernal and withont Becinmins.
rine abont these NOCS, he scemine some- The same afsirmed by llocinus also, of thC
times 1o mabe them but ihe Hleads or Sum-
Third HIyPOCTaSS, or PCyche, called ihe
micies of Souls. WVheresorethis PSeudo. Word ot ihe Second, as ihe Sccond, ihe
Placonicke Friniey so be Exploded, as WordoCche First. Porphurius his Te-
Contoundine the Disferences betroixt simony 10 this purpose in S. C yril; where
Ood and ihe Creature. Whereas ihe also Mind, or the Sccond Dirine Hyposta-
Christian Frinier HomorencaII, alt Dei- AIS, (thoneh said 10 have been Becolten
CY Or CreaTOUT; allother thines beine sup- from ihe First, ret) called ouronra
Posed 10 be the Creatures ofthose Fhrec and aurozros, IIS On- PareNE, and ils
lypoctales, and produced by their Zoyni- Own. OAsprins, and said 10 have sprune
Concurrence and Iustrence; they beine alt ont ouroibrcs, SelF BesOtenty. PagC
Rcally but One Cod. Pa∞C568, 570
Nevertheless, these forementioned DC
573,574.
This Mlysterions Ridele exponnded ont
pravacions and Adulcerations of That Di- of P locinus. Jhe plain meanine ibereos
vine Cabbala of ihe Priniey, not 10 be no more ihen ihis, That thoueh ihis Seconc
charecd upon Placo Bimsel( nor alttheTypoctalis procceded from ihe FIrH, vet
otber Anciene Placonists and PychaBOTC. vas it not produced by it after a Crea
ans; some of hich approached se near 1o curely manner, nor Arbitrarionsty by Will
ihe Christian Frinier, as 10 malie their and Choice, but in may of Nacural and
Threc Hypostates alt truly Divine, and Necesary Lmanation. Thus have some
Creacours, other thines beine ihe Creatures Chrictians ventured 10 call 1he L. OpO5, ou-
of IBCM.
ibid. 26dror, and L. X scip(o Deum, Cod From
First pherefore Placo himsels, in his
Timaus, carefully distinenisteth berroixt
nimseIF.
574, 573
Dionysius Pecavius, havine declared
Cod and ihe Creature, and determineth ihe Doetrine of Arius, ihat the l’ather
ihe bounds of cach, ascer ihis manner. was ihe onely Lternal Cod, and ihe SOn,
Thas ehe FirR, is that hich AlvayS IS, or Word a Creature, made in Time, and
and Was never Made; ihe Sccond, that ont of Nothine: Concludes it undeniabli
robich is Made and had a Bexinnine but manisest from bence, that Arius vas a
pruely ISnOL. Hlis meanine here perverred German, Truc, and Genuine Placonist.
by junior Placonists, nhom Boerius also Whereas il is most certain from Bence-
follomed. WVbere Placo takes it for gran- thac Arius vas no llaconistat all; andthat
red, That whassoever bath a Temporary Pecavius himself did not vell understand
and Succestire Duration, hadt a Beeim- the Placonicte Doctrinc. Llad Plato deni-
nine; and rhassoever had no Beeinnine, ed ihe Pternity of his Second Hypostalis.
Bath HO SUICCCCTIVC, BHE PETMANENEDUTA- called NOUS, he must have denied thC L
ion; and se concludes, That whatsoever cernier of Wiledom and Understandins
is lternall, is Cc; but mhatsoever ex- it sels; ibis beine 10 him ihat Wiledom
iss in Time, and bath a Bexinnine, CrCa- by Which Cod himsels is Wile, and mherebs
570, 572 he made ihc WVorid. Wich which aercett
No toPlaco, more Eternall Gods ihem also AChanaliUS; Our L ord is Wiledom
TUTC.
Onc. Whichnor Ideas or NOemaLA, butrne and nos Second to any orher Wisedom:
SubstancialI Thingo; his Firs, SccOnd, and, The Father OF the Word is nOL
and Third, in his Fpistle 10 Dionysius, or himselFWord: and, THAL WWAS HOE Word
Triniey of Divinc Hypoctases, ihc Ma- and Wicedom, wrtich produced Worc
Keto or Creacours of ihe whole Worta. and Wisedom. This in opposition, 10
AriuS.