# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0150
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0150?run=74
# Title: A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 137, Stück 2; Leibn. Marg. 137)
# Folio - , page id 1066511403:0150
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1066511403&page=150
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1066511403/jpgs/default/00000150.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 110 lines, status machine
# Lines: 110 recognised, mean confidence 0.87
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

PHe C OnFeNES.
and Second; and implies, noc so mueb a Gra-  rous wirh ihe RoVt. Besides wbich, oucreriis, ouo-
dacion, as a Circulation inthe Frinier. Pare cctic, and ouorviis, used by achanalius, and o-
600 601 ibers, es Synonynous with suitord. None u)
Ac for ihe Placoniis supposine their Phrec which vords senisy an Idemier of Singular X(-
Trpoltates (Thonxh Onc tncire Dirinier) 10 sence, but Generat or Univertal onelv. 260
have their Distinct Singular FsTences, itbont Conneit of Chalcedon, That our Saviour Christ
rohich ebey conceive iheu contd be nothine but es to bis Ilumanier, was Flomoousious or Con-
Threc Names, ibe Placonick Christian monld Substancial with us Men. Zbus does AchanaliuS
male ibis apolOBY; Tbs ihe OrctiodoX F2-
chers themselves vere ceneral ofibis persicasion,
7b 11 ibe Fstence of ib0 Codhead wherein all
ibe Threc Pertons agree, nor One Singutar, but
onclo One Commonor Univertal L Nence. Their
Distinction torhis purpose, betroixt esta and ice-
eanc ihserhe former nus Common or Generi-
cal, ehe lorrer Singularor IndividuaI. Theo-
dorec, Balil, and mang oibers. Pecavius his
actorledremene, ibst ibe Grects D niversally
eerced herein.
601, 602
bc Opinion os Crecorr Nysen, Crrit, Da.
malcen, and oiberr. Ibsc ihe Vertons of ihe
deny, theSon or Word, as such, tobe Hlomoou-
lious or Consubstantial ith Creatures; as also
hcassirmeth men to be Consubstancial with onc
anorhersevery Son Consubstancial and Co. eNen-
cialriih bis P’acher.
Pa5 C605, 606
Morcover ih0 Sensecfihe Nicene PacHerS, in
ibeir Consubstancialicy, may more fully appear
Srom ihe Doctrine es arius opposed by ihem;
bich made ihe Sona Creature, and therefore
(a5 achanalius rriteth) ercesinor or ainctecoloor
os adisserent LNenceor Substance fromt iBC P2-
cher. Proved elearty from AchanasiuS, Ihat by
ihe Consubstancialier os ihe Word, vus meant
Trinier no oberrosies One, iben os Phrce Indi- no more iben ils beine not a Creature, or LInere-
viduals under ibc same Species, or as Threc accc.
Men apree in ihc Come common Plumaniey.
These ibe Chics APercersos on Absolure, Inde-
Dendene, ond Un- Subordinace Co. equaliey.
Ibis ibe oncto fonle ihec S. Crril sinds in ibc
Placonis has cherdid nos osseri such a Consub-
Mancialier. It hereas ebis Primier Pricheilm: ihc
Three Pertonsrhercos beine no more One God,
iben Phrec Nen are Onc Nan. Plorvever Ibis cer-
eain ihac these l’acters did not suppose ihe Threc
Lrpollatesos ihe Prinier co hive all ibe same
Singular LNTencC. Anoiher Lxeream ibat sprune
upasterrearde in eheroom os ihc former Priche-
ilm, ind orned by no oiber durboriey, ihen os a
Laceran ConneilI.
603, 604
And ehas ehes Samene(of Singular LHencc
as noc asserred by ihe Nicene Fachers, and sirst
Opposers of arius. Pirst, cleurly actnomleded
606,608
604, 605
L’urrher Proos, ont os Achanalius thar by Con-
substancialier, is nor meant a Samene(Sos Singu-
lar, but onely os General L. NenCC. As also out of
S. Austinc.
6c8, 611
Lastlv. Thasihe Tlomoonlian PacherS did net
assert acainst arius, a SamenelS of Singular LF-
Tencc, evident from iheir Disclaimine ibose 1rvo
other vords, lavrodoon and Moroinor, Cas bavine
a Sabellian sense inthem,) ihe former by lpi
phanius, ibo larter by actanalius. 50 ihat
ibeyrobo asserred ihe son 10 be Plomooulious,
Consubstancial with ihe Facher. denied him t0
be Monooulious or Paurooulious, that is, 10
haverhe lame Sinpular L. NenCC.
612, 613
lirom all these Considerations, concluded hy
ihe Placonick Chrictian, Lb st as the Genuine
Prinicy os Placo aereed with ibat of ibeOe-
chodox Chriltians, in beine not Hecerooulian,
Dur ebis surcher lvident scom bence; because bue Tlomooulian, Co. estencial or Consubstanci-
by eccarius.
ihc same Orchodon Pachers, robo opposed Aria-
niem, did also condemm Sabellianitin; whicb
aseried, l’acter, Son and Hloly GhoH, 10 b0
al: not made up os C,Od and Creature, but alt
Hlomoxencalos Uncreated, or Creacour: so did
iho Priniey as iho Li’irst Orchodox anci- arians
buc Onc Tyvollalis, ibat is, 1o bave bur One and herein aeree mish ihe Placonicke Triniey; thac
ihe same Sinoular FHence; and consequent v ac-
Lnoroledeed nociber Priniey ihon os Names or
Vorde.
605
it as not Monooulian, or Taucooutian, One
and che Pame Singular Esence, under ThreC
Names or Hocions oncly: but really Threc Hy-
512
I1 appeares b also srom bence, Because ihe W ord postales or PertonS.
Nevertbeless, bere remaineth a Ouection 10
Tlomooulios had never auv other Senle, 1ben 10
sienisy ibe Aprcemene of thines Numerically be antvered; WBether Achanalius, ibe Ni-
disserine, insome Common and Gencrat Nacure cene Lachers, and allibe P irst Anci- Arians did
or LNenCC. S. Balit, Zbat ibc same ibine is iheresore asseri ibe same ibine wilh OreB. Ny
nos Honmonsions Co-estencial or Consubitan- sen, Cyril, and orbers, That 1b0 Threc Pertons
in ih0 Prinier, vere but Three Co. ordinace
Individuals, under ihe same Species, bavine
cial wich it self. bat alrvays One chins vich a-
Plocinus. S0 also in achanalius, heassirmine sbe onely a Speciliele unier or Idencies; (besides
Nocher. 1o ouolor ihe some oith ourerca in
Branches so be Homooutious aud Congene. Contene ol WilI) or ihat ihey all aeree in iho
M.