# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0152
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0152?run=74
# Title: A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 137, Stück 2; Leibn. Marg. 137)
# Folio - , page id 1066511403:0152
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1066511403&page=152
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1066511403/jpgs/default/00000152.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 110 lines, status machine
# Lines: 110 recognised, mean confidence 0.86
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

PHC CONTCHES.
rmbich i most os all Considerable, 10 Justisy ihn (Creacure. Worctiip: And ehis Vhercason, whythe
apolver. Ibc generalicy of Chrillian Pachers,
bosore and osterthe Nicene CouncilI, 1ootd upon
eha Placonicte Frinier, if Not as really ihe Same
ihinq vib ibe Chrillian, vet ac approuchine so
near therennto, 1bat it disfered chicstrin Circum-
Rances, or Nanner os Lxpression. Thus Justin Mar
ere. Clemens alexandrinus, Oripen, S. Cxprian
anciene l’achers so zealoustu opposed arianilin,
because it ihvarred ehat Desien; et PaB anicinB
and Idolaerisine ebat, which vas intended foi
ihc Unparanirins ot che Word. One Remar-
hable Passaeo os achanatius s0 ebis purpose.
Paye 627, 629
INbere l’irst Observable, That AchanaliuS ex-
or ihe Auibouros ihe Bock DC Spirieu Sancto, presty assirmeth the Pagans to bave WN’orstip ped
Fusehins Cclarientis; and obich is mest os all oriely One Unereated, and Many Creaced
1o ihc purpose, achanalius bimsels becivine a 60d5. Tbus Cres. Na2. That there W 1 buL
Sinal Pellimony ibereunso. 20 ubich maybes
added. 5. Rustine and ThcodOrcE. S. CY-
ril. bouhblamine ihe Placonicke Subordina.
eion. (Tumsels supposine ihc Frinier 10 bc
Threc Co. ordinace Individuals, under ihe
Sime Specisick Nacure of ibe Godhead) vet
ackomledees ibs Flaco Ws noc alcogecher 11-
noranc oC che FrOCM, _C. B,+ 1b ++ PIaCCs Sub.
ordinacion, os his Second TIrpotalis 10 ihc
LicA, Wa nos (us ihc arian) os a CreREIre
torhe Creacour; alceady made unquellionably V.
videm.
PoPC 621, 625
Itherctore a WNondersull Providence os MI-
miober Cod berc 10 betoben norice of. Ibat ibi
Doetrine, os a Friniey os Dirine Hypollales,
Bontd beencerrsmed in ibc Poxan Word Be-
Sore Chriltianier, as IE NVerC 10 prePArE a WAy
Por ibe Receprim of it amonest ihc Lcarned.
Wt bichebe junior Placonins vere so sensible ot
thac besides cheir orhrer Adulterations ofihe Pla-
conick PrinierbesorC menIoNed (Tor IhOCOLMIC-
nneme of iheir Polrcheim and Idolaerr) ibey
et leneb Innovsced and Alceredibe robole Cab-
bala; nro no tneer actnoroledsine a Priniey.
Onc Diviniey amonest the PasanS also. Aud
but ac teost. Ouncernier s Dirine Eypolta-
TesMmelr Besore ond belides ihe Friniey. ano-
ihee Eypoltalis Superione Thercunco, and Aan-
dine alono by e sels. 2bis siest staried by lam-
Treneus, Lhat they accribured che Frit place et
ehe Deiey eoOne Supreme God, 1b0 Malier of
ibis Universe. And Sccondly, Tbat 1o Achana-
sius, and all ihose orber Facters, oho chareed
tho Arians with Idolatrr, ehis was supposed not
10consist in Worstrippine Manv Independent, and
ScIF. Lexillene Gods, but in sivine Religious
WorThipioCreatureS: As ihC ArianS eavC a RC-
lieions W orstrip to theSon or Word, supposed by
ibemselves 1obe but a CreREIre.
629, 630
but is arians eniteros Polrcheitin or Idol-
ery. sor bestorvine Relipious Worcix upon ibe
Son, or Word, as a Creacure, (iboueh ihe Chies
os CreatureS, and ihat by rohieh all’others vere
Made) much more they cuiliy bereos, roho RC-
lixiousr worchipped oiher Interiour BCins.
Achanalius; Thatno Creacure rhe Object of RC-
livious Worthip, and Thar ihe Orchodox wor-
sripped ihe Dirinier, in ihe Plumanier os our
Saviour Christ. Necorius branded wiih iho
name os a Man- worchripper. Some suppose
Thar necessary eo Idolatur, whiel is Impossible;
10 Worstrip more then OnC, es OIMNIPOTENE, or
with Mencal P aeria.
630, 632
blichus, carried on by Proctus, rsken notice e by
And non bave wo suffeiento Ansivered ibo
Objection apainst ihe Bacuralier ot che Idea ot
God as includine Onclincls in it; srour the
Pasan Polucheilin. W hat farther bere incended
S. Cyril: besides robicb, Proctus also added concernine ihe same, Cas a l’oundation for our
orber Phancallick Friniciesos bi orn. 625.
627
Anoiher Advanesee of ihis Placonicte Prini-
(Y. extendina 10 ibC presentrime perhaps nol
Dnincended also by Divine Providence, 10 abate
ihe Considence of ihose Conceited WVils, oho se
bolaly decry ihe Prinier for Non Cente, M solute
Concradiction eo Rcalon, onte Impoltibilier;
benhe   sind, thst ihe hest and Vreest W its
amonelt the l’aparis, thoz bavine ne Scripture
Revelstion 10 impose uponihem, vere vet fond os
ilia EIypochelis.
Detence os Christianier) disserred, 1o matie
room for a Contutacion of al ihe Acheiltick AF-
BUIenIS.
CHaL V.
a Parcientar Consutation oF all che Arhei-
stick Crounds.
 chere is no Idea oFGod. Jhat in A-
Aud nor it suficiencty appears That she siver corbis, Iho Idea ot God haibbeen alreodus
Anciene Placonills and DxchaBOrCANS, vero declared: viZ. A Persect UnderstandinB, BCiMB
noc 1o be taxed for Polrcheilts and IdOlacers, Ummade, or Sell. PXillene fiom lcerniey, dut
ihe Cause oF all ocher ThinS. In wbich, No-
vine Hypoltales. One erand Dessen os Christi- thine Unconccivable, nor Concradictious. Ibat
in sivins Rellrious Worthip so their Threc Di-
anuy, 10 sece ihe Worid from Idolaery and these Consounded Acheilis chemselves, wbo deny
1b.
I. est Mentticte Arpumene; Liat
tu