# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1665036141:0202
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1665036141:0202?run=74
# Title: Theologorum Academiae Duisburgensis Johannis Claubergii Et Martini Hundii Disputationes Selectae (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 183)
# Folio 184, page id 1665036141:0202
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1665036141&page=202
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1665036141/jpgs/default/00000202.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 34 lines, status machine
# Lines: 34 recognised, mean confidence 0.90
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

134
IO N D I F
25 P.
I
 l
EDV CT1S,
D LS PV Y A Y LO VI.
In qua agitur de Sexto, quem Pontiheii Veroniani
Retormatorum Consequentiis imputant, defectu, qui
CA, qQuod in illis altera praemissarum sit solius rationis,
e ex hoc capite errori obnoxia, atque ex propriis Ad-
verlariorum hypochesibus crincitur, conclusionem,
quae ex altera praemisarum Scripturae; altera na-
turalis manifestationis, lezitime elicitur, esse
sidei, vel saltem sufficere ad refutandum
errores Pontisicios.
I. CExtus Consequontiarum nostrarum, secundum Walenbur:
Dsensium censuram, defectus est: Duod aliera praemisarum sit
solius rationis es ex hoc capite errori obnoxia. Mechod. AuSus. Wa
lenb. PaTt. 2. C. 4. 5. 6. H. CT. P. 100. Quem detectum hoc
ibidem illustrane exemplo: Forment adversarii hoc argumentum:
Non potest idem corpus simul esse in caelo e in terra, sed corpus Christi
est in caelo (ACt. 3: 2T.) Ergo non potest esse simul in terra, nec con-
sequenter in Ducharistia, uri docent Catholici (Ponriticii) Verum fate-
ancur adversarii (Reformati) dictam conclusionem deduci ex antece-
denre, cujus altera proposicio est rationis tanum e non scriptura: adeo ut
in aperenda tali consequentia errare possit, scilicet ratio, vel lesi de-
bec, possint.
TI. Dro instructione Catholici (Poneiticii) addunt p. 203. Duando
altera pramiarum est scripturae, alcera evidens, e forma arzumenti bona,
tunc sequi conclusionem Fbeolosicam, prorsus cerram, veram, ims taleim
conclusionem ex quorundam sententia non incommode aliquando d ci divi-
nam, quia habet causam partialens divinam; alteram nimirum pramissa-
ruI3