# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1665036141:0239
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1665036141:0239?run=74
# Title: Theologorum Academiae Duisburgensis Johannis Claubergii Et Martini Hundii Disputationes Selectae (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 183)
# Folio 221, page id 1665036141:0239
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1665036141&page=239
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1665036141/jpgs/default/00000239.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 33 lines, status machine
# Lines: 33 recognised, mean confidence 0.90
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

DE CONSEOLMLETIS
F.X S. SCRTPFARA.
A
+L
DES P V Y A Y 1O XI.
In qua de Nono adeoque OHimo, quem Nori Metho.
distae in Papatu ReFormatoruni consequentiis ex Scri
pcura deductis impingune, defectu agicur, qui cst,
L.
quod conclusiones deduitae ex antecedente, cujus al
teratantum praemissarum est Scripturae, non sint
Formaliter revelata.
XFOnus, quo Methodistae consequentias nostras laborare vo
L A lune, defectus est, quod Conclusio earum non sit formaliterre-
velata LOGHunEuE autem de Conclusione, Uti leCtOTOS (LIOS MOMCME,
quatenus deducitur ex antecedente, cujus altera propositio est Scriptura, es
cujus alcera supponitur esse rationis vera vel etiam evidentis, ut ita di-
stineuatur hic defectus a quarro ex sexco. Wethod. August. PAPT. II. CaP.
IV. 5. 9. NUm. CXI.
II. EF ne quis eos putet praecer racionem raciocinari, dete
ctum hunc monstrant ex ratione articuli fidei, quia nihil est, inqui-
une, fidei nisi sit formaliter revelarum, praedicta autem conclusiones non
sunt formaliter revelata, adeoque non possunt esse formaliter fidei; nec for-
maliter credenda. Ibid. quibus adde Num. CMII. Objectum formale
fidei est formalis revelatio. Unde efficiume, id quod virtualiter in forma-
liter revelato continetur, non posse esse objectum formale fidei, nec assensum
ejus esse fidei, ob istum defectum formalis revelarionis. F:F Ap Pend. O. II.
TTuM. LII. ubi cessat formalis revelatio; cessat verbum Dei, cessat obti-
ratio credendi, cesat fides. Vnde nesant illud, quod sequitur ex reve-
ratione expressa, cui additur principium rationis, aequivalere revelationi
expressae, negant id esse verbum Der aut expresse credendum.
MI. Ex his ic nos expediamus, pulo diligencius contideren
MIS.