# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1665036141:0457
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1665036141:0457?run=74
# Title: Theologorum Academiae Duisburgensis Johannis Claubergii Et Martini Hundii Disputationes Selectae (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 183)
# Folio 439, page id 1665036141:0457
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1665036141&page=457
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1665036141/jpgs/default/00000457.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 40 lines, status machine
# Lines: 40 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

DE NIANDOCATIORE ORALI.
apparebit, eam diverlo respectu e laciorem e angultiorem esse
suo definito; neutiquam rero, quemadmodum oportebae, ci ad-
aequari.
II. Latior eA, quatenus r. etiam bibitioni seu, ue Lacinius
loquamur, potationi aeque convenit. 2. spirituali manducationi
applicari porest. Os enim quod edic corpus Christi non rangen-
do, non mandendo, non oustando, non deglutiendo cst os ndei.
3. In definitione verbum nutriendi tam lacam haber signiticationem,
ut relacum ad corpus proprie, relatum ad animam capiaeur meta-
phorice; ex tamen definitum, oraliter manducare, proprié et
Stricte (IIEE. 4. O5, Pars animalis cujuscunque, latius pater al-
cera parre hominis, cum ore praedicae sine res plurimae ab homini-
bus diverlae.
III. Strictior definito est definitio, quoniam primo quidem mu-
eas animantes proprie edere negac; deinde altirmat, nihil proprie
comedi, nisi ad nutriendam alteram hominis partem.
IV. Sicur aurem definitio non respondet definito: ita nec pri-
Or ejus pars posteriori congruit. Ejulmodi non congruentia lunts
assumi ore, id est, altera tancum parte hominis rel potius partis,
nempe corporis, parre, ex tamen nutrire partem utramlibet, vel
corpus rel animam. Sane uc finis illius descriptionis rel conceptus
Formalis disjunctam habet loguutionem, persive, sive: ica inicium
similicer disjunctum esse deberet, hoc sensu, quod Manducatio,
qualis hic describitur, aut ore aut corde tat. Sic describeretur man-
ducatio a spirituali e orali abstracta, quemadmodum nucricio à
Spirituali ee corporali hic abstrahitur. Adhaec sicuri circumcisio
cordis nobis deleribitur in Paeris Literis, quod Aac sine manibus Co-
lo. 2: FT. ita nuericio animxe describenda, quod Aat SINC OrC. PC
quomodo haec inter sele conreniune, ore allimi ab(que contactu,
e tamen nutrire animam: quod sine contactu, incellise rirtutis;
elle non pocest? Os aurem neque corporeo seu physico rangit mon
do, neque rircuris contactu Domini corpus actinsit, quia nullam
in illud, ut ipsi adrersee partis Theolosi contendune, operatio-
Nem exEKCeE: quam nequidem exercore potest, nili corporaliter
TaHSAE.
V. Detinitionis lex Facile princeps est, ut clara sit ec perspicua.
Ideoque rocabulis propria significandi vis non est adimenda, ne-
que aquiroca seu homonyma sune in detinitione admierenda,
Praler-