# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1665036141:0480
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1665036141:0480?run=74
# Title: Theologorum Academiae Duisburgensis Johannis Claubergii Et Martini Hundii Disputationes Selectae (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 183)
# Folio 462, page id 1665036141:0480
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1665036141&page=480
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1665036141/jpgs/default/00000480.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 41 lines, status machine
# Lines: 41 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

4.62
CF A H B B R CTF D ISF. l.
certe postulabit, ne ris argumentorum illorum obscurior cuiguam
rideatur, uc clarius explicemus caulam, cur locum omnino pro-
Ximum ex adequatum hic acrendere debeamus. Resp. Nisi id
Faciamus, qualtio prorlus nulla erit. Nam E de loco generaliter
tantum ex contuse loguamur, nemo dubicabie, quin unum i
demgne corpus pluribus in docis Tumul elsequeat. Nempe exth. 3.
intelleximus, quomodo idem homo sunul in nare, Cnul in mari,
Simiul in aere exictat, irom, quomodto eodem remporis omento
SE In terrA, aqua _ aerC RC. Praetorea, niE distinctione illa ye-
mur, unum idemque corpus simml e Cemel dici poterie moreri ec
non moreri: ex. gr. dtum naris in mari prorehieur, qui sedet in
puppi, semper in uno loco manoc, si rario habeatur partium naris,
inter quas eundem sicum rerinet: _ ille idem altidue locum mutat,
S rario lictorum habeatur, quoniam assidue ab aliis recedit, acque
ad alia accodit. Ve igitur obserrances illud Logicorum, erroris mater
fuit aequivocatio sempers sine ambisuitate loquamur, ac cerri aliquie
deloco, motu e similibuscad Physicam perrinentibus rebus satuere
Pollimus, distinctioneicta necessario vrimur. Oui Logicam didicit,
aerendat, cux illaars desiniciones ac dirisiones adaequaras esse retic, Cux
in definitione senus. proximum, in demonstrarione rEco tor SexnNorS i
temque caulas _ effecta proxima, in diritione partes proximas re-
quirat ec. _ rationes inrenier nostris de loco adaequato e proximo
non ralde absimiles.
VII. Ouemadmodum autem non sequitur, illud, quod pocest à re
abese, si insit, pose sapius eidem rei inesse, uti e dictis patet: ita neC
sequitur, quod res non possit destrui vel impediri ab eo, à quo tamen non
depondet. Cerre lumen a ralris ligneis non pendet, attamen ab
iisimpeditur. Rex occiditur a subdiro, pacer a Alio, cuuntamen
Alius parre polterior, _ subjectus a rege dependeat, non COnErdo
Tollicur ligni unitas à serra, a qua camen non dependet. Et,
quod magis ad rem Facie, duratio poherior unitate, neC EAIeM
propterca unius rei multiplex esse durario porest. Ouin ipo cum
existencia sic ipla essentia, prour actu est, non potelt mulciplicari
exiltentia, nisi etiam multiplicetur essenria. Sic erso e locis po-
Serior unitare, neque uniras ab eo pendear, an ideo mutriplicacio
loci proximi _ adaequati non crertet unitatem corporis ? Aenimis
etiam liberalicer ac generalirer promunciatur; quod unitas corporis a
loco, hoc est, a superticie corporis proxime et actaequare ambien-
EiSS