# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0029
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0029?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio - , page id 1672256038:0029
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=29
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000029.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 37 lines, status machine
# Lines: 37 recognised, mean confidence 0.85
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

el
1211
sec
il
I1
AD LECTOREM.
re quamcumque opinionem probabilem, ab
vno Doctore classico inductam, aliis recla-
mancibus e cacencibus, cui si adhereat A-
delis, nequeat illi Contellarius ciera pecca-
cum moreale absolutionem negare. Deinde
hec reoula in Aidei arciculum abibit, quam
uis nullum in Scriptura, et Traditione ver-
DE exTCE, Quo ContineatuE: Guamuis omnes
antiqui Parres et Theolosi reclament; et
quisquis hodie ab illâ aulus fuerit discedere.
in harelim incurret, lansenista Aer. TIOC
ruo rllogilmo complexus sum ommia ratio-
num momenta, quibus recentiores Theolo-
sinouam definitionem reoent, ec se aliquan
do a lummo Pontifice obcenturOS SperaNE:
immo quidam se iam obcinuisse glorian-
EUT.
Nisi ad controuertiam nostram de proba-
bilicatis rlu spectaret, hac, quae superiori ar-
sumento insinuata cst, grauissima dispucatio
de rerum definibilitate, ommino pexecermie
terem, nec. cam eHt animus pro dionitate ret
tractare: paucis tantum deliba bo, quantum
patitur breuitas Peatationis. Imprimis ri-
diculus essem, Sihoc argumento, quod pas-
Hop. Fa
sim ingerunt Caramuel, Scubrochius, et alii
commonerer, quasi percerretactus, aliqua
huius generis in lcholam nostram definicio-
re, cujus nullum exstare contendo exem
 iis