# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0060
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0060?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio - , page id 1672256038:0060
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=60
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000060.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 34 lines, status machine
# Lines: 34 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

EPISTOLA
duo quaelica. Primo an vera sc detinicio opinionio
probabilis, ac proinde curx, quod carione aliquo
graui, id est, quae vezeac e difficilis sc Tolurionis,
contirmetur: deinde an leuia lincargumenea quibus
impuonaneur Eidei mysteria, e vicae moralisprinci.
pia. Acque incerdum pro ingeniro candore Laceris,
ee non posse relpondere: imma Hlarcricus esles, si
secus scriberes: nam Adei arriculus est, quae docer
mylteria Cupra omne nacurae creacae lumen polica,
non polle cuidencer probari, licur nec solo lumine
nacura cuidencer solui argumenea, quibus impu-
GManEuE.
Ouzrenon dubico, quin _ hâcpraetarione, ee quale
primâ in cuam sencentiam velicarione, agnolcas et
Faceare, hanc concra ce dispuracionem, nec gratis de
animo licisandi, nec solius detensionis D. Fagnani,
Sed religionis causa suscepram esse, quae omnino pe-
xiclicarur, Sisten duxe definiciones a re consticurae, de
opinione probabili e dubia: ex quibus, nihil Fall,
auc mali excosicari porelt, quod deduci nequear, in
parrocinium cuiulcum que ririi d erroris; quodque
rimendum cst, indebreni crupeurum, nili cu vali-
dum aliquem asgerem opponas, quo cor malorum
illunies. Noemi diluuio lonse periculosor, Actatur
E ConiBeAEUE.
Dices Forre, haec queobiicimus, scandala esse pu-
sillorum, id est, lenia; ex quibus iuxra definirionem
are policam, existere possic opinio dubia, non proba.
bilis. Sed coneravegeo qua a me in cuam lencen-
eiam prelibaca Cunt, et Fusius prolequenda, non adco
lenia elle, re sinc concemmenda: e sin cibi, qui inni-
eta polles vi ingenii, cerre aliisnegorium Facesane,
qui experiuncur srauissimas de Fxistentiz Dei, im