# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0087
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0087?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 7, page id 1672256038:0087
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=87
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000087.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 39 lines, status machine
# Lines: 39 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

DE VOV PROBABILTL. GRHERAL.
exarati erant, ee prohibuisse illorum qui in al05, ca Mlclal
invita, alias prodissent: Ec nili Theophilus mucatione ciculi de
Epiltolari contellione cuis dilisentiam lelenet, de 
lillet uc dbibsoe eutonal, crehidctie hujus letu noi
sicut reliquorum duorum, qui Wominicanos inlectabalte
non pasturam nouam editionem; quare cum illi fucum fecerie,
boni consuler religiolistima Societas, illum à me hac diserta-
tione refelti.
ART TCVEVS SECYHDYS.
Arcumentum dissertationis de Fpistolari confessione
Theophili, es nostrae ad illa responsionis summa
e partitio.
I5 brevirer rniverum perstrictis, accingo me disserta-
L Lrioni lonsissimae de Epistolari confestione concra Tho-
mistas, operosius, ac per parces examinandae; d rbi aberra-
nic, aut in nos excurrit, returandae; rbi primum Ccriprionis cau-
Cam, et controuversix statum paucis aperuero. Fheophilus, PrO
sua anrigua cum Bibliopolis Lusdunensibus necessitudine ee
sumno in Zypoeraphos imperio, operi de auriliis posthumo
Suarelii, e occasione controuerliarum Tanlenianarum, post
plures annos, ab authoris morre publici iuris facto inseruie
hanc de confestione Epistolari dispucationem, duplici de causa:
cum Suarelii propuonandi aduersus decreca Ponriticia, tum
more luo lacescendi Thomiltas. A summis Suaris laudibus
exorditur, nihilo inferioribus, ijs quas prima diacriba, de
Immunitare Crriacorum, ee rbique ita acerbe exagItaE, re
Dene blasphemix, ee haerelis acculet in Diuum Thomam con-
rectas. Refeet a Paulo quinto, nullo ciraro loco, indicitarmm
tamquam doctorem eximium, plurimum in Ecclesia eminen-
tem: addit inferiores Antistites fuisse, qui illum habuere pro
oraculo, (5 commonem aratis sua magistrum, E5) alterum Au-
sustinum perhonorisica appellatione donarent Deinde celebrato
omnium conseni e ore, huius authoris indicio et sententia-
rum delectu, receptum passim norat incer recentiores Theo-
10505; sententias à Suare tradicas, eo ipso, quod illum habene
authorem, videri posse probabiles: quia authoris sunt valde ac-
curati, nec deest vnquam idonca ratio, qua sencentiam suam
muniat.