# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0090
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0090?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 10, page id 1672256038:0090
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=90
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000090.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 40 lines, status machine
# Lines: 40 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

156. L. dFCL. l
iudicum ans a Permae abertant, qu s u salts
efferune, quam qui acerbius insectantur, qui Ouiedo de Ripal.
dam suari, quam qui D. Thomae, de Augultino Suarem a
quant. Acque re eo redeat oratio, rnde Profecta elt; non allen.
eioL, his cribus de Suare altertis tora disputatione, quorum pri-
muumponic, Theophilus eamquam ab Aduerlario concestum.
(quodque impuonandum sascipio) Cacis habere Suaris rnum
nomen Authoritatis, re possit probabilem, ec cerram reliquis
doctoribus cacentibus, aut reclamantibus, opinionem, qualibet
de re consticuere. Sccundo id effecisse de interro poenitentix
Tacramento; id est de confestione, et absolutione seripto datis
ante Clementis decretum. Tertio probabilitatem FuTaI COn
ciliasse cundem authorem Olementis decreti interprecationi
qua ait prohiberi à Pontisice confectionem de abfolutionem in-
TeF Absentes copulatiue, non disiunctine. Ad haec eria capita,
tocam exercitationem reuoco: qua rbi dilisenter dilcussero.
nihil peaecermistum erie ex Theophili dissertatione, quod sic
alicuius momenti. Id maxime enitar demonstrare, rlum e de-
lectum certae et cucae opinionis probabilis non ica arbitrarium
esse de verlatilem, remutari possit successu cemporis ec iudicio
Recentiorum, vel cuinsquam doctoris clastici; (ed ommino repe.
cendum ab ipla de qua asirur rei nacura, re demonstratum ea
seguenti sectione.
SECTIO SECVK
In Suaris Authoritas, vel cujusuis doctoris classici de
qualibet re opinionem probabilem es securam efficiat,
ubi de 2sa probabilitaris generatim.
VEYS Controversix primam partem omnium. Grauilli-
L man, ex reliquarum cardinem pene intactam praecermi-
sic Theophilus, aur religuis duabus permiscuic. Fgo contra le
orsim cractabo, ex iacia fundamenta quibus aliae inaediticentut.
Maona concentione, et maioribus ac Frequencioribus libris, hoc
Caeculo nostro agicacam controversiam de opinionis probabilis
ru, neque Pro dirnitate cractare, neque omnino praeterire pa
ticur hic lOcus; re conster, ad minus hoc inde an TaNCA SIE Sua-
ris, vel Alcerius Theolosi authoritas, re caeceris intercedenti-
bus; opinionem a se inventam reddat probabilem ec tutam,
eciam in re lacramencaria, qua ad Palurem requirieur ex medis.
DEVOCANE, CSFICACIN EE HECEMITaLE