# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0096
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0096?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 16, page id 1672256038:0096
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=96
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000096.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 41 lines, status machine
# Lines: 41 recognised, mean confidence 0.90
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

Cd inconunam. imque iocetanuat esse putarim, modo tame
rebus Cacris eligioni parcatur: sed ne qun sme
illas ego ferte non possum, qua adcirinam moru ( sidet I
grane discriment anancum. Lolatotum OMem aperturus
Subiunoic: Lecmitum, quid enim abis probabilia expectes, qui
ex Carholicorum Scholis receptissimam probabilitatis doctrinam
tamquam multiplicis erroris oririnem proscribere conantur 
Fit subinde excurrit in cum locum de necessario probabilitatum
ru, in Scheus,  pulpiris, in Foro, ec roltris apud omnesrec
PIO.
XC
DTSP. T. SECT. TI
Sui Dialogi pasina ita habe Disserrationes tum sasjus etiaue
L AR AGR AP ATYS P RTMYS.
Immerio nodis doet probabilitates ex nostra sententia
in totum tolli.
TR A R F plane CubH hec à oraui Theologo dicta: quid
LLen anua, aut quid acrocius scripaster in apertos tdei
e generis humani hostes. led qua reri specie qua Aide nOS Ora
eat ranco odio; qui id rnum obcendimus in religionis delectu
in rita humana de Christiana instituenda, cutiores dubiis opi
niones esse anceponendas. Hloc ne est doctrinam morum e
Fidei in srave discrimen rocare: nec minus est ab omni proba-
bilitatis specie aliena, altera acculatio, quod probabilibus bel.
lum indixerimus, ec illas extinctas relimus; cum ex ipsiulimet
contronerhie consticurione constet, nos rarios probabilicatum
oradus, e diver sa genera distinguere ee probare. An probabi.
licares omnino proflisamus, qui etiam dubia ad reum seuocan.
da docemus: Videlicer cum duo disparia mala imminene, nec
grauius amoveri porest, nisi dubie ec minus probabili adhereas
sencentie, que tunc fic certissima. Flec ne dica, FTonoratus Fabri.
et Scubroexhius doctissimi Theologi, sed ne rix quidem eple-
be rultici ignorare pollune: Oua ergo ratione purant aliquid
probabilicaris subesse, huin(modi cauillis e accusacionibus: Sane
huiulmodi dispucatiu arces _ Fraudes, quas ne in Circulatoribus
Feras a Theoloris rurpare srauissimam Theologie inuidiam
creane, ex iamdin invisam malis, bonis eriam luspectam Faciune.
Vuo rerbo coram hanc calumniam dispellam. Probabilitates t
nobis tancum displicent, cum illis inest periculum, ne nos ab
oficio abducant, et in nouum peccarum impellane: id vero
accidie