# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0102
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0102?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 22, page id 1672256038:0102
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=102
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000102.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 41 lines, status machine
# Lines: 41 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

5
F, SEOF.
e A R A CR AP HYS L LLMVS
Conlusio es compenalum rocius Diss.rtationis
IS breuicet obseruationibus premissis, corius controuersin
larcem placet ruica argumentatione inuadere. Vel rbique
nulla excepta materia, das optionem opinionis, ae que auc mi-
nus probobilis, quae libertati Favet, ee censes tuto de pruden-
cer anceponi sententix, quae consulie Caluri ec honelto; rel hunc
laxiorem rum probabilitatum ris aliquo fine cohibere incer
res praecepto ad Calurem neceslarias, nec pareris perrinere ad
omnia viexe humana _ Christianae officia, seu ad res efficacid
causx de medii necellarias: Arqui quidquid horum afteras
rerumque improbabile est: erso non est admierendus rlus pro-
Babilicatum, nili inera hosfines concineas, ne rinquam, quam-
diu dubia res est, aut rerinque probabilis, commodum ofticio
et libextarem praecepto anceponas. Licet ii Auchores, qui pro
babilicatibus portam aperuerune, inter le dissenciant, de huiul
modi discordiis pene seiplos conficiane, camen ad duo capita
TEHOCANEUE. Forum sentus d dissentiones accurare inquisuie
_E FCFCFE MCFCOTUS PaFEC 2. arT. 27. Pascaligus Theatinus, in
quie, docet, nulla excepta maceria, licitum ene lequi minus
Probabilem opinionem, et minima probabilicas habeatur esse
probabilem. Bresserus exisit ad hoc, euidentiam de eius proba
bilicate: Baldellus dicir, licitum Fore rlum opinionis minus pro-
babilis, prius adhibita diligentiâ, an postimus certiores teri de
magis probabili opposita. Sanches aic, consilium esse, non
Peaeceptum sequi probabiliorem. Sanctius de Caramvelalle-
runc, nec peaeceptum ese, nec consilium: Imo Pa(chalious
rulc praceptum ese sequiminus probabilem, si aliquod ora-
ve damnum immineat, quod nesant Sanches de Villalobos.
Alii dicune, rsum minus probabilis, licicum esse in Foro con-
Scientix, non in Foro Iudiciali. Ira Sanches de Larman. B0.
nacina licicum docer rium minus probabilis, nisi immineat
Dericulum quod ricari prudenter nequear, sine ru oppolit
sentencia curioris. Denique Sanches, hanc regulam de lequen.
da rbigue minus probabili, alteric, cancum esse probabilem,
Paschalisus vult elle cerristimam: hos omnes ad primum ca-
Dut reuoco liberrimi rus probabilium. Ad secundum perri-
rent, qui ab hac resula excludune Sacramenta, re Filliurius
Suares: de illi qui excixiune mareriam fidei licur BanNeS, e