# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0111 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0111?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 31, page id 1672256038:0111 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=111 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000111.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 39 lines, status machine # Lines: 39 recognised, mean confidence 0.94 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. DE VOV PROBADTLET. SACRAM. Rem, hoc rnico fundamento nici: cum, qui certe ee pruden- ter asic, non oportere duci cuidentibus: Patis esse, si probabi- lia sectetur, quae constitui possunt ab rno doctore pio, qualemm omnesnorunt suarem esse, huius aui doctisuimum Theolo- sum. Acqui haectua arsumentario ex me omnino Falla est rbigue; nisi forre conrroverlia sic de rebus poliriui Turis, qua in diem aliqua ex PaPEeMUTantUT; e ex iplo Suare non ra- let in re lacramentariâ, de qua licem cibi mouir Lunior ille, qui Sacramentum Poenicentia exemic a Suaris Faculcare consti- tuendi opiniones curas e probabiles. In hac enim Disserratio- neinstiruta pro suare, purnantem deletir d abnegat ipsemet Suares: qui agnoscie, nihil curi se posse Ratuere de Contessio- ne d Absolutione lacramentali, nec de Sacramentis in torum, quae re media Caluris ex insticutione dinina sunt necellaria, nisi suadeat cutiora; e quae seipla rere, non probabiliter cantum cum insticutione Christi conveniant. Vnde ridetur Procisata Secunda quaestio de Sacramento quoad reram que partem, sive Confestionis, sive Absolurionis incer absentes per Evistolam auc per Incernuncium administraro. Ouamuis enim Suares senserie, absolutionem Sacerdoris impenlam reo poenicenci per Epistolam, etiam dum absens est, probabiliter haberi po- tuisse re licitam et ratidam ance decrerum Clemenris VITI. Mocus (reait) Auctoritare Antiguorum Theologorum, ma- xima Thomistarum, quos rule, in ea fuisse sententia; FeuCFA deceptus est, nisi relie sencentiam illam de licieâ ee vali- da per Epistolam absenti collata absolutione speculatiue pro- babilem esle, non practice, neque rila ratione tutam; quia suxca ipsiulmet Suaris principia, in rebus efficacia medii ne- cellariis, qualia sunt sacramenta, ee prae omnibus baprilmus et poenicentia, ad securitatem opinionis nihil juvant rariones verismiles, nihil revera consentiunt cum insticutione Christi. e amoucatur omnis formido erroris, quae ex dissentione Theo- logorum nalei Poler; aequi absolutionem absenti impensam, licer aliqui roluerint licicam esse e ralidam, plures tamen Theolori reclamarune, et ex ru Eccleliae, acque ex decreris Elementis VTIT. et Pauli V. mihi certum est a Christi Insticu- tione recedere: PrgOnec Suares, nec quisquam Doctorum Pocnic huic opinioni probabilicarem ruram conciliase.